[TrunkCom] VOC and SCAT

Fri, 19 Apr 2002 22:35:48 -0700

On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 12:14:01 -0400, "Jerry Kacprzycki"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>>>> Wayne M H <[email protected]> 04/19/02 10:53AM >>>
>>On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 00:43:20 -0400 (EDT), JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON
>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>Well, SCAT and I think that VOC is Motorola's version of SCAT is =
really
>>>something you could listen in conventional mode, but I haven't seen =
too
>>>many of them around, or heard of too many of these types of trunking
>>>around.  They're usually in relatively low traffic areas of a system
>>>because they are only one channel systems.
>>
>>Actually I believe GE copied Moto, but nevermind.
>>
>>In conventional mode you can't really monitor them as you constantly
>>get the control channel. It's either annoying data, which is a
>>majority of the time, or voice.
>>
>>VOC is actually out there a lot more than it seems. There's a local
>>system which runs single channel and two channel VOC sites (And who
>>uses them is kept strict). When administering VOC you have a lot of
>>timing issues to contend with and considering most system admin
>>intelligence levels, it doesn't get used. Neat feature though.
>>
>A two channel V.O.C. T.R.S.?  You mean to tell me that there is a two =
channel V.O.C. with 2 control channels?  I thought that V.O.C. / S.C.A.T.=
 only got 1 control channel; just like a regular system.
>

No, you read too far into it. The site has two channels with the
control channel being VOC capable.

VOC is just an option for the control channel regardless of number of
channels.

Wayne