[TNham] FCC letter to WR3S
Greg Williams
k4hsm at lock-net.com
Wed Jul 18 21:56:05 EDT 2007
Looks like it's getting interesting over in Nashville area.
http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/KIMBR07_07_14_1099.html
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
1
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Enforcement Bureau
Spectrum Enforcement Division
1270 Fairfield Road
Gettysburg, Pennsylvania 17325-7245
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
July 9, 2007
John C. Kimbrough
597 Foxfire Court
Murfreesboro, TN 37129
SUBJECT: WARNING NOTICE and NOTIFICATION OF REMOVAL OF AUTOMATIC
CONTROL PRIVILEGES: WR3S REPEATER OPERATION
Case #EB-2007-3018
Dear Mr. Kimbrough:
By letter dated April 10, 2007, we notified you that monitoring
information before the Enforcement Bureau indicated that on various dates
in March 2007, your repeater stations operated without proper control and
re-broadcast portions of commercial TV programming and music, contrary to
the Commission's rules regarding the Amateur Radio Service. The monitoring
information also shows that operators on your system failed to identify
properly and used false call signs.
Our letter warned you that the Commission requires that repeaters be under
the supervision of a control operator and not only expects, but requires,
control operators to be responsible for the proper operation of the
repeater system. Control operators must take whatever steps are
appropriate to ensure compliance with the rules, including limiting the
repeater use to certain users, converting the repeater to a closed
repeater or taking it off the air entirely. Repeaters bearing your call
sign are your responsibility. Your decision to operate repeaters was a
voluntary one and you are responsible for any rule violations occurring on
those repeaters. Finally our letter requested detailed information from
you about the operation and configuration of your repeaters.
The information you provided to the Commission apparently indicates that
you are operating 12 repeaters under your call sign, on the following
frequencies: 145.170, 145.370; 146.955, 147.360, 223.960, 224.160,
224.360, 224.560, 224.620, 224.660, 224.760, and 224.980 MHz, and that you
have used at least ten control operators. The rebroadcast of commercial
programming, improper identification and lack of identification by end
users, and your own transmissions over your repeater that can be
reasonably be interpreted as threats to complainants, indicate your
inability or unwillingness to control your own repeater stations.
Furthermore, the failure of all ten of your control operators to prevent
or eliminate these violations is inexcusable, especially in view of the
wide scale linking of these repeaters.
You will shortly receive a directive from the Atlanta office of the
Commission removing the automatic control privileges of your repeater
systems, pursuant to Section 97.109(d) of the Commission's rules, 47
C.F.R. S: 97.109(d). This means that you may not operate ANY repeater
stations under your call sign unless you are the control operator and at
the control point at all times to make certain that Commission rules are
being followed and that no interference is occurring. When you are unable
to function as the control operator of the stations identifying with your
call sign, they may not transmit.
Finally, failure to control stations bearing your call sign, or any
communications over your repeaters not complying with Commission rules,
will result in enforcement action against your license. That enforcement
action may include a forfeiture (fine) or revocation and suspension of
your Amateur license, or modification of your Amateur license to remove
voice privileges. Any threats, direct or indirect, made to complainants or
perceived complainants over your repeaters by your users, will result in
revocation proceedings against your Amateur license.
We remind you again that establishing a repeater station is a voluntary
decision, and that such stations are no different from any other Amateur
station in regard to obligations presented by the Commission's rules
regarding the Amateur Service, nor do they confer any additional
privileges.
Finally, the information you submitted conflicts with the records of the
regional frequency coordinator, and it is not clear which repeaters
operate with your call sign as the identifier, and which repeaters
identify with other call signs but list you as trustee. We strongly
recommend that you review the number of repeaters you are attempting to
manage and operate, and that you make sure your actual repeater operations
conform to the regional frequency coordinator's records.
Sincerely,
W. Riley Hollingsworth
Special Counsel
cc: FCC South Central Regional Director
--
Gregory S. Williams
gregwilliams(at)knology.net
k4hsm(at)knology.net
http://www.etskywarn.net
http://www.twiar.org
http://www.icebearnation.com
More information about the TNham
mailing list