[TMC] GPR-92

[Richard Knoppow]

    Thank you Bruce and thanks to the others who answered. 
Someday I will get to tune one. Can't afford to buy anything at 
the moment. It is indeed an elegant looking receiver but TMC made 
a lot of elegant looking stuff.

On 3/21/2021 1:56 PM, triodes wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Yes, they do exist,  and I am fortunate to own one.
>
> Here are some photos of it.
>
> 73,
>
> Bruce, W2XR
>
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Richard Knoppow <1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com>
> Date: 3/21/21 4:35 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: tmc <TMC at mailman.qth.net>
> Subject: [TMC] GPR-92
>
>    Not any traffic here lately so I will drop a rock into the pool.
>    I am curious about the GPR-92. Does anyone actually have one?
> From what I've read not many were built. Evidently they were
> difficult to make and performance may have been partly wishful
> thinking. They are so sexy looking one wants them to be extra
> good but I think it was a miss rather than a hit. There is
> probably stuff in the list archive but I have not looked.
>
> -- 
> Richard Knoppow
> 1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com
> WB6KBL
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> TMC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/tmc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:TMC at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: 
> http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 

-- 
Richard Knoppow
1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com
WB6KBL