[TMC] VOX stability
Sheldon Daitch
sdaitch at kuw.ibb.gov
Thu Apr 16 11:41:28 EDT 2009
Last paragraph, change AVC to AFC.
Sheldon
Sheldon Daitch wrote:
> Larry,
>
> Many of the high end diversity receiving systems had AFC circuits.
>
> Check out the CV-157 converter, for instance.
>
> Also, the RCA SSB-3 Receiver system had an AFC circuit, and
> I believe the Pioneer Diversity system also had an AFC circuit.
>
> The transmitters for SSB/ISB and RTTY many times would have
> a small amount of carrier (pilot carrier) injected into the transmitted
> signal and
> the receivers had a sharp carrier filter and system designed specifically
> to track this pilot carrier and keep the end to end system on
> frequency.
>
> For instance, check out the second page of the MMX-2 sales
> brouchure:
>
> http://jptronics.org/radios/TMC/bulletins/TX/tmc.ssb_204-4115.pdf
>
> Transmit characteristics, the level of carrier suppression is selectable,
> specifically for that purpose.
>
> These AVC circuits would keep the end-to-end frequency error under 1 Hz,
> if working right. It didn't mean the system was on the absolute correct
> frequency, just the system was together.
>
>
>
> 73
> Sheldon
>
>
>
> TELEGRAPHER at att.net wrote:
>
>> What would the requirements as far as stability of a transmitted signal have been back in the 60's? Whether high seas, Navy, Attache, etc. Now i am asking this concerning an AM signal. This unit with drift of + or - 100 cycles could not have been useful in CW, SSB nor RTTy service. Should an end user expect 20 cycle accuracy?
>>
>> larry
>> W0OGH
>>
>> l
>>
>>
> ______________________________________________________________
> TMC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/tmc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:TMC at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
More information about the TMC
mailing list