[TheForge] Welding preheat

[Ron Childers]

Arc is fine; why not use a longer, smaller dia handle so you don't have to
mess with tongs?

-----Original Message-----
From: theforge-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:theforge-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Paul N
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 11:44 AM
To: Sponsored by ABANA
Subject: [TheForge] Welding preheat

I'm about to make my first largish hammer, and I intend to arc-weld a 
"handle" stub onto it. Since I only have hobby-duty welding equipment, 
I thought I'd get another opinion or two before I proceed.

The hammer head will be forged in a coal forge.

Here's what I've got:
Material:
  2.5" dia piece of railroad locomotive spring, about 5" long (around 7#)
  1" dia A-36 for my "handle" (about 6" long so I can grab it with 
reasonably sized pair of tongs)

Choice of welders:
  Lincoln 225 AC/DC ("tombstone")
  Lincoln SP-170T wirefeed (.035 FCAW)


Here's the procedure I'm considering:
I've beveled the end of the 1" piece leaving about 1/4" flat at the bottom.

I was going to use the 225 AC/DC and 6011 rod DCEP to get the best 
penetration

I'm going to preheat both pieces. From what I've read, I should preheat 
the spring to about 300 degrees.

Questions:
Is this likely to produce a weld that's adequate to hold up to the 
hammering? (Manual, striker with a sledge)

Is the preheat temp critical? More specifically, is hotter better?

thanks,
**Paul
______________________________________________________________
TheForge mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/theforge
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:TheForge at mailman.qth.net

TheForge mail list group photo site is
http://www.photoaccess.com
Login: blacksmithblacksmith at hotmail.com
Password: anvil

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

 
 
****************************************************************************
********
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
viruses.
****************************************************************************
********





 
 
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************