[TheForge] Top of a broken anvil?
Peter Fels & Phoebe Palmer
artgawk at thegrid.net
Tue Sep 9 02:33:39 EDT 2008
Hi Andy;
More steel or good cast iron with the maximum mass directly under the
hammer and the best possible fit up: Minimum # of horizontal cold
laps/joints, too please.
If you were going to use it for embossing or some other use where a dead
blow is better, then lead is the right material.
I sound positive, but i'm only guessing as usual...pf
A Vida wrote:
>
>
> Peter Fels & Phoebe Palmer wrote:
>> Andy:
>> I'd argue that lead would be the wrong material here.
>> The object is to provide rebounding mass that will rigidly resist the
>> hammer's blow and provide the maximum immediate counterforce focusing
>> the applied energy on the work.
>> While lead has great mass per unit volume, it don't rebound worth
>> diddle, just sucks it up and gets a little warmer.
>
> Good point. However, bear in mind that the forces are being
> resisted by the very solid steel parts of the new base. The lead may
> still damp some of the energy. What might be more suitable?
> _______________________________________________
> Manage membership or unsubscribe at:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/theforge
> theforge mail list group photo site is
> http://www.photoaccess.com
> Login: blacksmithblacksmith at hotmail.com
> password: anvil
> ___________
>
>
>
More information about the TheForge
mailing list