[TheForge] More trig (Re: lamp shade)
April & Bill Clemens
newky2 at dejazzd.com
Thu Nov 9 20:04:32 EST 2006
Mike,
My humble apologies for doubting you.
Yes I was using the HOP as H.
I translated "measured at right angles to the upper and lower edges" from
your diagram to mean the height of the lamp(HOL) not the perpendicular
distance between the top and bottom of the side. At that point I was too
far gone to ever recognize my error.
I think this is the place we start discussing which way to point the horn of
our anvils. I tend to dance around the anvil so anywhere in a horizontal
plane works for me.
I think we should leave it as an exercise for all the other trig wizards out
there to prove that all 3 formulas are identical when you take into account
the relationships between HOP, H, and B-T.
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: theforge-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:theforge-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Mike Spencer
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 1:56 AM
To: theforge at mailman.qth.net
Subject: [TheForge] More trig (Re: lamp shade)
If the formulas, algebra and trigonometry is boring, just "move along,
nothing to see here" as the story-book English cops say.
Bill wrote:
> 1. I don't think your formula is correct.
>
> For any case where S > H * sqrt(2)
> ( or conversely H < S / sqrt(2) )
>
> then ( sqrt(2) S / 2 H ) is greater than one
>
> and arcsin is undefined.
The problem is that I didn't make any explicit constraints on what
numbers one might plug into the formula.
First, lets refer again to the diagram of one panel of the truncated
pyramid again, with your labels (T & B) one new one, angle q:
T
------------------------ ---+--
Side / \ |
S--->/ \ | Height H measured at right
/ \ | angles to the upper and
/ \ | lower edges.
/ q \ |
---------------------------------- --+---
Angle of this B
corner is q
Now consider the extreme cases of a truncated pyramid:
Extremely steep: The "pyramid" is a vertical square tube. Angle q
is 90 deg, angle between sides is 90 deg, S = H.
Extremely flat: The "pyramid" lies all in a plane, essentially one
square inside another with corresponding corners connected by
lines. Angle q is 45 deg, angle between sides is 180 deg, S =
sqrt(2) H .
For all real truncated pyramid lamp shades we might build [1], angle q
will be between 45 deg. and 90 deg. If we make angle q smaller than
45 deg. then the four pieces can't be assembled into a square-based
pyramid!
Back to the hentracks:
If angle q can never be larger than 90 deg or smaller than 45 deg,
then:
sin 90 >= sin q >= sin 45 = sqrt(2) / 2 = 1/sqrt(2)
1 >= sin q >= 0.707 = sqrt(2) / 2 = 1/sqrt(2)
But (refer to diagram):
sin q = H/S
So to make a real pyramidal object, the ratio H/S has to be
greater than (or equal to) sqrt(2)/2.
H / S >= 1 / sqrt(2) Constraint on values in my formula
But your counter-example is any case where:
H < S / sqrt(2) [Bill]
or
H / S < 1/sqrt(2) [Bill, rearranged]
Values of H and S that satisfy your counter-example inequality are
excluded by the constraint and by observation that you can't make
a real truncated pyramid from panels with angle q < 45.
So, you can plug any numbers into the formula, even numbers such that
H < S / sqrt(2) but those numbers don't correspond to pyramid panels.
> For the case where H = S / sqrt(2) slope of 45 degrees you get
>
> A = 180 degrees
Just so. That's a slope of 45 deg. for angle q, not the angle between the
pyramid's side and the plane it sits on. A = 180 is correct for the
completely flat "pyramid".
> http://www.josephfusco.org/Articles/Dihedral/Dihedral.html
>
> Using this site I came up with the following solution
>
> A= 2 * arctan (S/H)
Well, it looks like we're at the point where we ought to be able to
swap scribbles faster that by email. But lessee...
On that web page, he has a pyramid (not truncated, but that doesn't
matter) with a 24x24 base and a 24 height. That's the height measured
from THE CENTER OF THE BASE TO THE APEX. That makes:
height of the 26.833 Corresponds to H in our formulas
triangular panel
edge of the panel 29.394 Corresponds to S in out formulas
Using my formula, A = 2 arcsin( sqrt(2) S / 2 H), I get 101.54 for
the dihedral angle.
Using your formula, A = 2 arctan( S/H), I get 95.22 for the dihedral
angle.
Hmm, what's the conflict?
If, instead of using the height of the triangular panel, you use the
HEIGHT OF THE PYRAMID measured from the center of the base to the apex
(call that HOP or 24) and use S, the length of the side of one of the
triangular panels (29.294), then:
2 arctan( S / HOP ) = 101.54
which agrees with the web author's calculation and with my formula.
So I think our disagreement is in being precise about what is "height".
Puff puff pant.....
Jeez, if exercising the little grey cells protects from Alzheimer's,
I'm staying safe as can be. :-)
[1] We're ignoring the possibility that our lamp shade might be
funnel-shaped (infundibular, if you're a Kurt Vonnegut fan :-),
i.e. with its base smaller than its top and appropriate for a
floor lamp. But why add computational mess? Figure out the
truncated pyramid "right side up" and then turn it over.
- Mike
--
Michael Spencer Nova Scotia, Canada .~.
/V\
mspencer at tallships.ca /( )\
http://home.tallships.ca/mspencer/ ^^-^^
_______________________________________________
Manage membership or unsubscribe at:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/theforge
theforge mail list group photo site is
http://www.photoaccess.com
Login: blacksmithblacksmith at hotmail.com
password: anvil
___________
More information about the TheForge
mailing list