[TheForge] Build a power hammer?
Jerry Frost
frosty at customcpu.com
Wed Aug 2 17:32:52 EDT 2006
From: "Grover Richardson"
<grover.richardson at gtri.gatech.edu>
> Yes. Having worked on several patents myself, the
> idea of a patent is to
> get credit for your work. And to make certain that
> no one comes in and
> takes it, you try to make the patent as generic and
> as wide applicable as
> possible. As such, they can be very confusing.
>
Just so. Another purpose of a patent is to carve off a
piece of the action by altering a marketable product,
process, etc. sufficiently to be legal and
insufficiently to be noticable to the customer.
The latter is why I think there are so many different
systems to do exactly the same thing in, amongst other
things, self contained pneumatic and hydraulic (fluid
drive) power hammers. Some of the valves are
indeciferably complicated compared to older, supposedly
more "primitive" hammers. The 1902 massey patent I
referred to or Mike Spencer's A & O have exquisitely
simple control valves. Later Massey patents and most
other pneumatic hammer patents involved, invariably
more complex, "improvements" to the control valves.
As you say though, Massey attempted to cover just about
every way a simple 1/4 or 1/2 turn valve with an
incorporated check valve could be used to control a
power hammer, including rivet, drilling and breaking
(jack) hammers. 1902 was pretty close to the time
electricity was becoming a practical tool in industry.
Till then, line drive mechanical and steam hammers were
the norm.
Seeing as Massey hammers were one of the big names from
the earliest days of steam hammers in England, I assume
the 1902 design worked as well or better than the steam
and mechanical hammers they replaced. By the 20's and
30's Massey valve schemes were as outrageously complex
as anybody's and if I recall correctly they were bought
out by Nazel, Beche, or? (I don't recall who) After
which the "improvements" in valving slowed WAY down.
Stagnated?
The "improvements" to other aspects of hammers is
pretty limited. After all, how much can you alter a
heavy "C" or "A" frame, rams, guides, bearings and the
like. The basic engineering for how heavy, rigid, the
piston area, stroke, etc. were well established a long
time before. The base power of one of these things is
determined by psi x sq/in & weight and cycle speed,
whether it's a master/slave system or steam/compressed
air like early power hammers or modern Kinyon type
hammers.
Anyway, the 1902 Massey patent has what I think is one
of the simplest full function controls for a self
contained power hammer.
Frosty
-------------------------------
If it ain't forged
it ain't real.
Wrought iron is.
The FrostWorks
Meadow Lakes, AK.
http://www.artmetalradio.com/
More information about the TheForge
mailing list