[TheForge] RE: Roses
Dave Brown
[email protected]
Sat Jan 3 10:11:09 2004
At 22:09 01/02/04, you wrote:
>I made these using the anvilfire "Russian Eosw" as a base. Maine
>differences are the choice of "bar stock" and I tapered the petals
>section so that the outside petal section was wider than the inside
>petals. That let me curve the base of the flower in.
>
>-Marc
>
>http://ironringforge.com/HomeProjects/RailRoses.jpg
Marc,
Really nice roses. The transition from RR spike to rose works real
well. The curving under the petals is a real plus from the basic rolled rose.
I'm also reminded of something I heard sometime back, I think it was from
Robb Gunter when he was talking about his roses and feathers. He said that
you are making the equivalent of a caricature in steel, not trying to
duplicate nature. Once all the characteristics are there, then it's a rose
(or feather). Everything else may be nice, but can make the piece too
busy. Or it was something along those lines. I tend to agree with the
notion that too much detail detracts from the art.
Dave Brown
Heritage Smithing
Green Bay, WI