[TheForge] Building a propane forge
[email protected]
[email protected]
Tue Feb 17 15:29:06 2004
Bruce
NJ
Congratulations, you are the first of many scolders to come. However, I make
no apology for using the term "vapor" as it is the definition which the
National Propane Association uses and is the definition adopted by the National Fire
Protection Association. Since the later writes the safety codes -- in close
consultation and cooperation with the former -- that government agencies adopt,
and since the former writes all other technical terms and makes the
definitions which are used...
you are outvoted.
"The only remaining possibility would be a
mist, or "aerosol", in which liquid droplets are entrained in air. I
submit that even this is highly unlikely under the conditions of
operation of any burner."
The problems associated with the difference between a true gas and propane
vapor (as "the powers that be" use it, I will too) are not only real, but are
taken into consideration in LPG equipment construction, and are frequently
encountered in cold weather by people using propane to run forges and furnaces. I
do not refer to so called "freezing up," which is simply the result of the
liquid falling below its boiling point, but of pulsing. The colder the vapor gets
the more vapor like, and less gas like, it becomes.
I think perhaps the problem you are having with my viewpoint -- and that is
all it is -- is a mistaken impression about my use of the term "clumps." I am
not trying to convey the thought of anything so enormous a a "droplet" and
should have made that clear. The particles envisioned are to small to even be
seen, but still affect combustion. To keep this friendly (because your comments
were very civil, and because I don't want to discourage further critics), I will
reiterate that my ideas of the whys and wherefores about the way my burners
work are definitely open to question. I am not a scientist, nor a combustion
engineer. That the equipment does work, just as stated--complete or near nearly
complete primary flame combustion -- and that the rest of the equipment in the
book lives up to my claims completely, is all I can guarantee.
Before anyone asks, the qualification "or nearly complete" is not a back door
for excuse making. These burners are going to be hand built, not turned out
in a factory. Furthermore, unless someone wants to stand around doing nothing
more than readjusting the burner, it will vary slightly in performance from
minuet to minuet. With acknowledgment of these two limiting factors, complete
means complete.
Again, congratulations on being the first challenger, and please don't
hesitate to call me to account again. When caught in a mistake I will 'fess right up
to it. More importantly, don't hesitate to try and make a better burner. That
is called progress :o)
Mikey
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed. To learn how
to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html ---