[TheForge] quench questions
Dan Tull
dantull at numail.org
Tue Dec 28 21:15:34 EST 2004
I don't think I would try either of those w/ super quench.
dan tull
georgia
abba, afc, S.C. psba, obg,sofa
----- Original Message -----
From: "gblacksmith" <gblacksmith at alamedanet.net>
To: <artgawk at thegrid.net>; "Sponsored by ABANA" <theforge at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: [TheForge] quench questions
>I think the hammer dies would harden fully if made from a deep-hardening
>alloy; ie, those with chromium added. The 10 series would not be as deep
>hardening as the 4140 or 5160 previously mentioned. The plain-carbon
>steels have a tough time hardening sections thicker than one inch, in my
>experience, regardless of quenchant used. Grant
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Fels And Phoebe Palmer" <artgawk at thegrid.net>
> To: "Sponsored by ABANA" <theforge at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 5:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [TheForge] quench questions
>
>
>> My fuzzy memory is that Rob G said he had used it for A36 hammer dies
>> and it yielded " Enormous toughness".......PF
>>
>> Andrew Vida wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David E. Smucker wrote:
>>>
>>>> It is always a good discussion on "super" quench, (I wish it was called
>>>> "rapid" quench, keeping in mind that there is no magic at work here.)
>>>> Best data I have seen to date is that with small section (1/2 x 1/2
>>>> square A36) you can get to a Rc of 50 or so. An that is without any
>>>> drawing or tempering.
>>>
>>>
>>> That would seem about right. I've made quite a few tools from
>>> A36... punches and chisels... and for the most part they have worked
>>> well. Most I made as throw away tools, only to find that they were too
>>> good to toss adter use, so they went into the handy bits bucket. For
>>> quick and dirty tooling, I don't think you can beat it.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> In large sections such as a hammer die or even a hammer die insert
>>>> would someone please explain the physics on how you will quench this
>>>> rapidly enough to get a hard surface let alone any depth of hardness.
>>>
>>>
>>> You may not be able to. dies for a typical 25# hammer may work out
>>> OK, but I'm not at all sure that anything bigger would. The only thing
>>> I can think of is if you had perhaps a couple hundred gallons of the
>>> stuff, had an enclosed area with hose and pump, donned a space suit and
>>> exposed the work to a violent jet of the medium, which I would expect
>>> would harden to a case at best... maybe 1/2 to 3/4 of an inch? But that
>>> might be just good enough. That's just a guess based on what I know
>>> about the materials. For all I know, it might fail completely... or
>>> maybe do even better, though I doubt it.
>>>
>>> I agree with you that just using a good plain tool steel is probably a
>>> much better bet. 4140 isn't that expensive, comparatively speaking, and
>>> the headaches saved, I think, are well worth the few extra dollars. Some
>>> things just are not worth rigging if you don't have to.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Manage membership or unsubscribe at:
>>> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/theforge
>>> theforge mail list group photo site is
>>> http://www.photoaccess.com
>>> Login: blacksmithblacksmith at hotmail.com
>>> password: anvil
>>> ___________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Manage membership or unsubscribe at:
>> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/theforge
>> theforge mail list group photo site is
>> http://www.photoaccess.com
>> Login: blacksmithblacksmith at hotmail.com
>> password: anvil
>> ___________
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Manage membership or unsubscribe at:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/theforge
> theforge mail list group photo site is
> http://www.photoaccess.com
> Login: blacksmithblacksmith at hotmail.com
> password: anvil
> ___________
>
>
>
More information about the TheForge
mailing list