[TheForge] New Gas Forge

Fri Apr 23 12:33:00 2004

Grant,
I think that the square body is the way to go, the widest part of a round
forge is in the middle not the bottom.  You are kind of limited to what you
can put in it.  There are no cold spots in this forge so this is not a
problem either.  This forge should be very efficient with the better
insulation 20# density vs. 8# density, plus the Plistix helps a lot too.
Larry Zoeller
[email protected]
Why Wait?  Move to EarthLink.

> [Original Message]
> From: gblacksmith <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Date: 4/22/2004 11:30:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [TheForge] New Gas Forge
>
> Larry:  Is there a reason that you went with a square shape vs. round? 
The
> "conventional wisdom" from some quarters suggests that round is more
> efficient.  What are your thoughts on this?  Grant
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Larry Zoeller" <[email protected]>
> To: "theforge" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 7:25 PM
> Subject: [TheForge] New Gas Forge
>
>
> > To All,
> > I just finished building a new atmospheric gas forge using square tubing
> > instead of round pipe.  It has several new improvements to it.  Check it
> > out and let me know what you think.  The forge can be found at the
> > following url.
> > http://www.geocities.com/zoellerforge/squareforge.html
> >
> >
> > Larry Zoeller
> > [email protected]
> > Why Wait? Move to EarthLink.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/theforge
> > theforge mail list group photo site is
> > http://www.photoaccess.com
> > Login:  [email protected]
> > password:  anvil
> > ___________
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/theforge
> theforge mail list group photo site is
> http://www.photoaccess.com
> Login:  [email protected]
> password:  anvil
> ___________
>