[TheForge] AFC Air Scheme

Shannell Sugrue [email protected]
Sun Mar 30 18:19:00 2003


Well to me its made it a different hammer. I have a 2 1/2" cyl 100# ram and
2 limit switches. The way I did it is I put a 3 way ball valve on the outlet
of the 5/2 valve to the top of the cyl. this way I can have full force/flow
blows or at a flick of the 3 way ball valve I have faster, lighter blows via
the pressure control valve, I get 230 or so BPM through the pressure control
valve, slightly less the other way. I think it helps also with air
consumption. I wouldnt build a hammer without it, although when I was using
a 2" cylinder I tried it and it didnt seem to have quite the same effect.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian" <[email protected]>
To: "TheForge" <[email protected]>
Sent: 31 March, 2003 8:28 AM
Subject: [TheForge] AFC Air Scheme


> The AFC air scheme uses a flow control unit. I know that some builders of
> these air hammers have elected to leave this unit out of their air scheme
on
> the hammers that they have built.
>
> What are the pro's and or con's of using this unit?
>
> Some feel the hammer runs better without it.
>
> I have ordered everything that I will need in the way of air components
with
> the exception of the flow control valve. I want to hear from some of you
who
> have built these hammers and who are actually using them.
>
> Opinions................................? I know I will get no responses
to
> that one   :-) lol
>
> Ian....
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.465 / Virus Database: 263 - Release Date: 3/25/2003
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/theforge
> theforge mail list group photo site is
> http://www.photoaccess.com
> Login:  [email protected]
> password:  anvil
> ___________
>
>
>