[TheForge] A36 vs 1018
Dave Brown
[email protected]
Thu Jun 12 10:12:01 2003
At 00:28 06/12/03 -0400, you wrote:
>Thanks.
>
>Since I've had a problem with a piece of A36 splitting, I've heard plenty of
>people talking about having similar problems.
>So I'm curious to know if A36 has a wider range of alloying elements than
>either 1018 or 1020.
>I assume 1018 and 1020 have tighter quality controls?
>Bob: A 36 has a slightly higher carbon content than 1018 or 1020, which are
>non hardenable 18 pt. and 20 pt, respectively. A 36 is said to make better
>tongs and other tools than 1020 or 1018. Both are available hot or cold
>rolled.
> Grant
According to the ASTM standard, A-36 has 26pts carbon for bars up to 3/4"
and 27pts for bars over 3/4" and up to
1.5". (see:
http://www.kentuckyelectricsteel.com/products/other_grades.html and scroll
down to see other standard inclusions like copper, sulphur, etc...)
1018 A-36
carbon .15-.20 .26-.29
Mn .60-.90 .6-.90
Phos max .04 max .04
Sul max .05 max .05
Silicon max .40
copper .20 (if specified)
Dave Brown
Heritage Smithing
Green Bay, WI
ABANA, UMBA, GoM, MODA, ARG