[TheForge] Conventional wisdom- Wrong again?
James Binnion
[email protected]
Tue Sep 3 12:38:00 2002
If you will think about it a bit you will see that we are no longer
in a place where a protracted war like WW2 is really remotely
possible. The main combatants with the resources to fight such a war
are very limited and are all nuclear powers with more than enough
remaining nuclear weapons to render the world uninhabitable. So the
MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) doctrine that kept the lid on the
Cold War still applies. Future armed conflicts involving the US will
be more of the Viet Nam , Desert Storm or Afghanistan variety. As
far as tanks go we still have plenty of tooling resources to make
them. And sadly to say (as I am a Navy veteran) the Navy is mostly a
freight company and portable airport delivery system now as there
just is not anyone who has any kind of naval power left except us. So
Battle Ships are irrelevant in that there is no one to fight with
them and modern naval weapons systems are such that the heavy armor
does not really make much difference in survivability to a ship
killer type missile or torpedo.
Jim
>Well you do have a point there, I still wonder if it is wise to rely on a
>number of smaller shops with limited resources do all of our large industry
>production.
>There are many HUGE machine tools that would be needed to reproduce some of
>the pieces just for a main battle tank.
>Now think about a battleship.
>Is that shop down the street going to be able to tool up to make a barrel
>for a main gun?
>No matter what we still will need some big manufacturers to do the really
>big stuff.
>Yeah, we probly will never get in a situation where we need to turn out war
>machinery like we did in WW2.
>And if we did we could probably make do somehow.
>But it's still a shame to lose some of the companies we have lost the last
>few decades.
>But on the upside at least blacksmithing is a growing back.
>
>Jim
>