[TheForge] The True Path in the 24th century.

Sat Mar 2 21:44:00 2002

Bob, I'm just talking through my hat here, but I think that he uses what he
gets submitted to him.
There are a couple BIG considerations, one, what work comes in and two, how
good are the photos.
If more folks would send in GOOD photos of their work, more of that would
get in the book.
The other side of the page :-) is that "they" are going to respond to what
the subscribers want, but
the unhappy subscribers need to voice their opinions to the 'Publications
Committee" (find it on the web site)
and to the Editor (also on the web site).
dave m.

----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: [TheForge] The True Path in the 24th century.

> i think what started this discussion was the letter to the editor from
dave mariette in the new anvils ring. his point wasn't so much "traditional"
(whatever that is) v. contemporary but rather should a forged/fabricated
(electric welded) project be on the cover of the anvils ring?
>
> the traditional v. contemporary question can't be answered but the
question of what should be on the cover of the anvils ring could.
>
> bob.
> ________
>
>
>
> >Can we set something to post this to the list everytime the debate about
> >"traditional" blacksmithing rears its head?
> >"David R. Crowell" <[email protected]>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/theforge
> theforge mail list group photo site is
> http://www.photoaccess.com
> Login:  [email protected]
> password:  anvil
> ___________
>
>