[Test-Equipment] Q and filters

Carl km1h at jeremy.mv.com
Sun Jun 22 18:34:45 EDT 2014


Which is why I still use the CE 100V transmitter I bought in 65 as part of a 
vintage SSB station.
I also have a Gonset GSB-100 as an alternate.

The HT-37 is a less expensive and readily available 100W phasing rig.

Carl




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David" <davidwhess at gmail.com>
To: "Discussion of Electronic Test Equipment" 
<test-equipment at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2014 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Test-Equipment] Q and filters


> One of the advantages of the phasing method of SSB generation and 
> reception is
> suppose to be its better audio quality do to less phase distortion.
>
> On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 12:16:11 -0400, you wrote:
>
>>Its very possible to do with LC components vs the group delay thru a
>>mechanical or crystal filter.
>>
>>The CIA couldnt use a R-390A for data due to the distortion and had a
>>special model built using the earlier R-390 all LC IF section.
>>
>>Listen to a properly aligned HRO-60 with its many IF transformers, even 
>>SSB
>>sounds different (better).
>>
>>Carl
>>KM1H
> ______________________________________________________________
> Test-Equipment mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/test-equipment
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Test-Equipment at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2014.0.4592 / Virus Database: 3972/7722 - Release Date: 06/22/14
> 



More information about the Test-Equipment mailing list