[Test-Equipment] Question regarding antique LCR bridge
Brooke Clarke
brooke at pacific.net
Tue Apr 10 11:59:11 EDT 2012
Hi Barry:
Do you have a schematic for the TF1313? Is the vibrator wired so that there's synchronous detection?
That's strange. The problem with using DC as a test signal is that you then get errors due to dissimilar metals, see:
http://www.prc68.com/I/Kelvin.shtml
Even when using a 4-wire Kelvin setup there's a real limit on low Ohms measurements because of this problem.
My TF2700 has provision to use external DC bias but makes the measurements using AC signals.
http://www.prc68.com/I/TF2700.shtml
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/Clarke4Congress.html
Barry wrote:
> I have a Marconi TF1313 LCR bridge (designed in 1960). When measuring L or C, the bridge is fed with an AC signal (1KHz or 10KHz). The output goest to a couple of amplifiers and the detected signal is fed to a meter. When the bridge approaches balance, the detected signal approaches zero and the meter indicates a null. Standard stuff for a bridge.
>
> When measuring R, though, a DC (full-wave rectified, unfiltered) signal is fed to the bridge and the output is connected to the input of the first amplifier through a chopper (old fashioned vibrator). Amplification and detection is the same process as for L and C.
>
> My question is why it is necessery to change the configuration of the bridge for R measurement? Why wouldn't it work with an AC input for R the same as for L and C and eliminate the chopper? Wouldn't a balanced bridge made entirely of R produce a minimum signal at the output and allow for null detection?
>
> I know the answer is probably simple but I don't see why this is done this way.
>
> Thanks,
> Barry - N4BUQ
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Test-Equipment mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/test-equipment
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Test-Equipment at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
More information about the Test-Equipment
mailing list