[Test-Equipment] Re: Test-Equipment Digest, Vol 48, Issue 14

[wolfbob]

What on earth are you babbling about? Try to show your 
ignorance more clearly.

WBob, WB6JPI

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <WA5CAB at cs.com>
To: <test-equipment at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Test-Equipment] Re: Test-Equipment Digest, Vol 
48, Issue 14


> Yahbut, it is the only significant FM parameter actually 
> written into the
> regulations.  It determines the only functional 
> differences between what you can
> legally operate below 29.0 MHz and what you can legally 
> operate above.  It is
> in fact the regulation that forced the US Military to give 
> up the Armor band
> between 20.0 and 27.9 MC.  It's why there was no 
> replacement for AN/PRC-8 or
> RT-66/GRC.  Etc. etc.  So if you are going to operate FM, 
> you should be familiar
> with it.  Plus it's another of those basic questions on 
> the license exams
> that no one seems to know the answer to anymore (Fd max/Fm 
> max).  Which was my
> point earlier before the bleeding heart liberals jumped in 
> with both chintz
> slippers.
>
> In a message dated 4/22/2008 8:35:18 PM Central Daylight 
> Time,
> mrmanes at gmail.com writes:
>> FM modulation index is function of both peak deviation 
>> and modulation
>> frequency.  It's not a terribly useful parameter where 
>> the modulation
>> signal is broadband, e.g., voice.
>
> Robert Downs - Houston
> <http://www.wa5cab.com> (Web Store)
> MVPA 9480
> <wa5cab at cs.com> (Primary email)
> <wa5cab at comcast.net> (Backup email)
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Test-Equipment mailing list
> Home: 
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/test-equipment
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:Test-Equipment at mailman.qth.net
>
>