[Test-Equipment] Emiossion Tube Testers
Avery Comarow
[email protected]
Sat, 07 Sep 2002 19:23:24 -0400
Dennis,
The Knightkit 600B is nothing to write home about and certainly not
superior to your Simpson, IMO. It's also cheaply made (as I know from
painful experience). Even if it works fine, I can't see how you're adding
anything by acquiring it.
73, Avery W3AVE in Potomac, Md.
At 11:14 AM 9/7/02 -0700, you wrote:
>Gentlemen,
>
> I have a small dilemma that I'd like your opinions on.
>
> I've used a Simpson model 305 tube tester for a number of years now
>and it seems to work as well as an emission tester should. It is in
>good shape and I have a copy of the roll chart.
>
> Recently a Knight Kit KG-600B emission tube tester followed me home
>from an estate sale. What caught my eye (besides the price) was that
>it is in nearly pristine condition looking as though it was just
>assembled yesterday. (The owners notes indicate it was completed in
>May of 1964). Very clean, good construction practice inside. Seems
>to work just fine.
>
> Which should I keep? I don't really need two. Are all emission
>testers basically created equal? My emotional choice would be to
>keep the Simpson (goes well with my 268 VOM)..but..what do you think?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Dennis-----------------
>"If you can remain calm, you just don't have all the facts"
>
>Dennis Wade
>KG6ZI
>Carmichael, CA
>
>_______________________________________________
>Test-Equipment mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/test-equipment
>