[TenTec] The Argonaut V, a beautiful radio implementing DSP
Paul Deyo
[email protected]
Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:29:37 -0400
I noticed that if you have a 19" crt, the argo pic on the Tentec web site is
almost exactly "actual size".
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joel R. Hallas
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:40 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] The Argonaut V, a beautiful radio
> implementing DSP
>
>
> According to the specs, the new Argo is 0.25" higher, 1.0"
> wider and 0.05" less deep than the scout. Pretty close!
>
> 73, Joel W1ZR
>
> k6xr wrote:
>
> > Stuart, You say the argo V is slightly smaller than the
> scout? I had a
> > scout and it looks much larger than the scout in the picture. That
> > would be a perfect size for my former case I used for my
> scout if that
> > is true!
> >
> > Reggie K6XR
> > K1-4 #1512
> > nc 2306
> > qrp 8701
> > ex-kn9akl, wa6lpx, wa6jmw
> > 48 years hamming
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Stuart Rohre
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 11:04 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [TenTec] The Argonaut V, a beautiful radio implementing DSP
> >
> > Last Fri. I received my Argonaut V. What a nice successor to the
> > Scout and much more!
> >
> > First of all, it is actually slightly smaller than the
> Scout, so was a
> > nice fit in my Wal Mart Plastic clam shell case that I used
> to carry
> > my Scout to Field Day, etc. It uses a similar hand mike,
> thus my four
> > pin mikes will all fit.
> >
> > The radio was surprisingly intuitive. At first, as I read
> the manual, I
> > wondered how I was going to remember how to get to various
> alternate
> > button functions and menus. (I am one of the rare ones who
> attempt to
> > read the manual first!)
> >
> > However, once grasping the basics of the Function button
> invoking the
> > alternate legends above the buttons, I was soon switching
> bandwidths
> > with the various filter positions. The SSB filtering seems more
> > effective than the Jones filter which I usually ran rather
> open on the
> > Scout during SSB work. You can really hear the difference in
> > selectivity between the 3kHz setting of the Argonaut V and the 2.4
> > setting. I was amazed that voice was very intelligible on
> good signals
> > even at 1.8 kHz setting.
> >
> > The CW filter comes up at the 1 kHz position, which is a
> good starting
> > point. I find 200 Hz narrow filters too tight for my ears,
> but it is
> > there if you want it.
> >
> > Having added features like Pass Band Tuning, and a several
> step noise
> > reduction circuit; are welcome additions to a rig. For
> those who have
> > been long time Scout users, you will enjoy the new added bells and
> > whistles which do not unduly complicate use of the rig.
> >
> > There is one knob to the right of the finger dimple main
> tuning knob
> > that controls the menu settings once a function is selected. It
> > appears like the dual knobs of several of the other controls, with
> > which Scout users will be familiar, but it is a single control. I
> > realize they made it appear dual as a symmetry thing, but I
> would have been just as happy to have it a single
> > color knob. The only thing I am having to get used to is
> that when the
> > attenuator, (RF gain) is invoked, it is a step function and
> if you are
> > not watching the S meter or listening to the audio, you do not know
> > after it is invoked that it is "on". There is no
> annunciator led that
> > it is on. However, it is a simple matter to punch Function,
> then the Attenuator
> > button, and see if the gain changes. On a dead band such
> as some of the
> > solar flares have caused, it is not as obvious when it is
> active as on
> > open bands.
> >
> > I love spinning that dimpled knob. It is very fast even
> though there
> > are only two steps of tuning rate.
> >
> > As some have noted the Band control steps the bands up in
> frequency, ie if
> > the rig comes up on 20m, and you hit Band you go up one
> band. That means
> > you wrap around the bands to get to a lower band. I have
> not yet played
> > with Band Stacking but I understand that is a way to take care of
> > moving down. Out of long term habit, I usually start out
> on 20m, and
> > see if it is open, and if not, step to the next lower band
> and so on.
> >
> > With the Scout, I simply reached over and grabbed the next
> lower band
> > plug in, with one hand while starting to unplug the band in
> use, (power off of
> > course). I never thought about band order. Yet, my less
> used other end of
> > the world radio does have up and down buttons for the
> bands. Oh well,
> > already, I find I am used to the quick action of the V and its
> > architecture.
> >
> > Since the Scout did not have RF gain, the step RF
> attenuator is a welcome
> > addition. I do not miss an RF gain control. My
> philosophy of radios is to
> > keep it simple and allow more people at Field Days to be
> comfortable
> > with operation of a radio not their own. The Argonaut is
> going to be a
> > great competitor in this regard.
> >
> > The multifunction analog meter is also my favored way of handling S
> > meter, power output, and other functions. On the Argonaut,
> the SWR is
> > done as forward and reflected power which is more meaningful anyway.
> >
> > Hopefully, the bands will quickly improve and contact
> evaluations can
> > be made. But, I am already happy to have a general coverage
> receiver
> > in the ham shack.
> >
> > One of the greatest things is how quiet 80m sounds even tho it is
> > summer! What I mean is that there is not the extra hash that many
> > Yaecomwoods suffer on the lower bands, even if you invoke their RF
> > attenuation. The Argonaut receiver is sensitive but without the
> > spurious. I may find my self investigating 160m what with
> the AM mode
> > on this radio!
> >
> > Anyway, good job Ten Tec, this is a Radio Amateur's Radio,
> with enough
> > DSP bells and whistles, and remote control and updates of
> firmware to
> > keep the computer types happy. Yet, it looks as a radio
> should look
> > IMHO. 73, Stuart K5KVH
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tentec mailing list
> > [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ten> tec
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> >
> Tentec mailing list
> > [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ten> tec
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tentec
> mailing list
> [email protected] http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>