[TAC] Selections

[Hank Kohl]

GroupF1 shows more background, so I'd agree.

SignQSL (without the boxes) is good, uncluttered, etc
SignF1 - You're right .... It's Miquelon.  Don't need the St Pierre &
Miquelon at the top!
SignF1 & 2 are the same picture, Now I think they look about the same.

The label, or the printing on the card will show who is confirming the
QSO, so the basic operator calls are all that is needed on the reverse
side.

And I threw in a sunrise with calls.

Are there any other ideas for the write up on the reverse side?  (Does
anyone really read them?)

73    Hank

On 12/8/05, Kurt Meyers <pasteur at bex.net> wrote:
> Of the selections posted last evening for the FP/ QSL card:
>
> My wife likes "GroupF1".
>
> Moving right along...
>
> I prefer "GroupF1" over "GroupF2"
>
> and
>
> I prefer "Sign-F2" over "Sign-F1".
>
> As to "Sign-F2" I wonder if it isn't redundant to put "Saint Pierre & Miquelon" on it. Isn't one of the points of photo that the "sign" tells where we were?
>
> As to the debate of "sign" vs "clan", I have no strong feelings either way. I lean toward the "sign" because it shows Miquelon as we found it, unobstructed by us and our stuff. On my desk happens to be a card from VP9/K1YR printed by LZ1JZ. The front shows dawn on Bermuda. It says nothing about K1YR or amateur radio.
>
> Also, I just received my KH5 Palmyra Atoll QSL, not a LZ1JZ product. The front features a main photo of the atoll with 3 sub-photos, two on the island and one taken from the aircraft that transported them. On the reverse are listed the calls of the 6 ops with check-off boxes to designate a particular QSO.
>
> Just some thoughts,
>
> Kurt
> ______________________________________________________________
> TAC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/tac
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmmain.htm
> Post: mailto:TAC at mailman.qth.net
>


--
'Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their
level then beat you with experience.'    -anon