[Swan] SWAN 250C six meter rig question

[Greg Mijal]

Hi Jeramy:
Not more than 5 minutes ago I found exactly what you are talking about.
I jumped the two RCA's and BOOM!
The receiver now works!
Thanks for the heads up OM
73's
Greg
WA7LYO
Kinston NC
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeramy Thibodeaux" <kg4azt at earthlink.net>
To: <swan at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Swan] SWAN 250C six meter rig question


> Something else I would like to add to Herman's post is that if you are not
> using the external VFO then you need to ensure that you have the accessory
> jumper plug installed.  This plug jumpers pin 1 to pin 8 on the accessory
> socket and ensures that the VFO signal makes it to the rest of the mixers
> and amps for proper transmit/receive.
>
> 73
> Jeramy
> kg4azt
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <N4ch at aol.com>
> To: <swan at mailman.qth.net>; <boatanchors at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 6:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [Swan] SWAN 250C six meter rig question
>
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> Regarding the query about the Swan 250's VFO  frequency:   The "original"
>> Swan 250 had an IF at 10.7 MHz, and  was single conversion.   The
>> injection
>> was low side, meaning  that for 50.0 MHz operation, the VFO injection was
>> at
>> 39.3 MHz.    The VFO itself ran at one third of this frequency 
>> (subsequent
>> tuned circuitry  picked off the third harmonic of the VFO itself), 
>> meaning
>> that at a transceive  frequency of 50.0 MHz, the VFO itself was running 
>> on
>> 13.1 MHz.    There's some info on all this in a product review of the 
>> Swan
>> 250
>> in the July,  1967 issue of CQ Magazine.   There's also a similar 
>> write-up
>> of the  subsequent 250-C in another CQ review; see the August, 1969 issue
>> for
>> that.   Also note that in the later 250-C there was another important
>> change (besides the obvious receiver front-end changes, mechanical dial
>> "bandset" for the VFO, addition of the meter's receiver "S" meter
>> function,
>> etc.).........the 250-C's IF got moved to 10.9 MHz instead of the 
>> original
>> 10.7.
>>  This means that in the 250-C, the VFO injection is 200 KHz  lower than 
>> it
>> was in the 250 (at Fo = 50.0 MHz, the injection is at 39.1 MHz,  which
>> means that the VFO itself is running at 13.033333 MHz now).    ALL the
>> Swan
>> tube-type rigs (350, 500, 700, the 250 series, all the  "Cygnets", etc.)
>> remained single-conversion; the VFO injection was always either  above or
>> below the
>> IF, with the difference always being the IF frequency  itself.
>>
>> 73, Herman, N4CH.
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Swan mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/swan
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Swan at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Swan mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/swan
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Swan at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>