[Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP?
Zack Widup
w9sz.zack at gmail.com
Sat Feb 25 18:24:15 EST 2017
Not quite sure what that means. The HAARP facility has a Part 5
Experimental license WI2XFX. Professor Chris Fallen also holds amateur
radio callsign KL3WX.
By the way, I am a radio scientist. I spent a year on my Ph.D. in radio
science at the University of Illinois once. I had a great chat with Dr.
Paul Bernhard KF4FOR (a principal HAARP researcher several years ago) at
the Dayton Hamvention some years ago, after he did a presentation on HAARP
research there. When I was in college, Brillouin scattering was just a
theory we kicked around and we had no way to test it out. I was happy to
see that the HAARP facility was finally able to verify that the phenomenon
exists.
The EME experiments at 7 MHz were fascinating. I wish I had recorded them.
I did hear the echoes on about 70 percent of the transmissions.
73, Zack W9SZ
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 4:53 PM, W4JDY EM79wu <w4jdy1520 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from
> this list
>
> Therefore transmission must be registered as experiments thru NTIA and
> ITU...you are in my works now.
>
> Sent from my iPhone 6
>
> > On Feb 25, 2017, at 14:59, Zack Widup <w9sz.zack at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe
> from this list
> >
> > Not true. Disassembly was considered and some of it was. But the
> University
> > of Alaska expressed enough interest in it that the disassembly was
> halted.
> > The station is owned by the U of Alaska now, to be used for academic
> > purposes.
> >
> > 73, Zack
> >
> >
> >> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 11:09 AM, W4JDY EM79wu <w4jdy1520 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe
> from
> >> this list
> >>
> >> HAARP was disassembled some time ago.
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone 6
> >>
> >>> On Feb 25, 2017, at 10:04, Token Original <T_O_K_E_N_ at hotmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe
> >> from this list
> >>>
> >>> That might explain it then. You might have been receiving something
> >> else,
> >>> there were several other transmitters on the air at various times
> trying
> >> to
> >>> pass themselves off as HAARP, including one on 2800 that sent, in CW "V
> >> V V
> >>> V V V DE HAARP" several times. Or it is possible you heard them,
> HAARP,
> >>> during transmitter testing.
> >>>
> >>> Why do I say you might have heard something else or heard transmitter
> >>> testing?
> >>>
> >>> All times rounded to the nearest minute.
> >>>
> >>> 1933 Pacific time, on 20 Feb, 2017, would be 0233 UTC, 21 February,
> >> 2017.
> >>> At that time HAARP was on 4440 kHz in O mode twisted beam with CW. It
> >>> remained on that frequency until 0259 UTC, at which time it went to
> >> about 2
> >>> minutes of transmitter testing, alternating between 2800 and 3300,
> >> changing
> >>> modes, and making transmitter adjustments or measurements, there were
> two
> >>> short transmissions on each freq during this time, under 20 seconds
> each.
> >>> At 0302 UTC they went to 2750 kHz. At 0303 UTC they started the
> >> Luxembourg
> >>> test, they stayed in that mode and transmitting on both 2800 and 3300
> >>> simultaneously until about 0343 UTC. From about 0344 until about 0434
> >> UTC
> >>> they were doing the artificial aurora testing, and that involved
> >> sequenced
> >>> transmissions on 2800, 2820, and 2840 kHz, the 3300 kHz freq was not
> >>> involved.
> >>>
> >>> So, if the email was sent at 1933 Pacific time, and you turned on at
> that
> >>> time, or within the next 27 minutes, HAARP was not on 2800 or 3300 kHz,
> >> but
> >>> rather on 4440 kHz. If you tuned in during this time, and based on
> your
> >>> frequencies, you could not have been hearing HAARP.
> >>>
> >>> From about 0259 UTC until about 0301 UTC HAARP made two short
> >> transmissions
> >>> each, alternating, on 2800 and 3300 kHz, not more than 40 seconds total
> >> on
> >>> each freq. This apparently was transmitter testing. This is a
> candidate
> >>> for your description, however in my recordings I hear no noise as you
> >>> describe, so I don't think this is the time you are discussing.
> >>>
> >>> 0302 until 0303 HAARP was on other frequencies, not 2800 or 3300 kHz.
> >>>
> >>> And at 0303 UTC they started the Luxembourg test, simultaneous
> >> transmissions
> >>> on 2800 and 3300 kHz, no alternating between freqs as you describe.
> >>>
> >>> I think you said you did about 10 minutes of listening and hearing the
> >>> alternating between 2800 and 3300 kHz. There was no time that night
> that
> >>> HAARP was alternating between those freqs for that length of time, they
> >> only
> >>> alternated between those two freqs for slightly less than 2 minutes.
> >>>
> >>> It is possible, maybe, that you heard someone trying to spoof HAARP.
> >>>
> >>> Token
> >>> Mojave Desert, California, USA
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: KD7JYK DM09
> >>> Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2017 7:11 AM
> >>> To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations
> >>> Subject: Re: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP?
> >>>
> >>> Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe
> from
> >>> this list
> >>>
> >>> : Ae we talking about the first evening or ? during the Luxembourg
> >> tests I
> >>> : assume since you mention the two frequencies. If you can pin the date
> >> and
> >>> : time down - I have 800 khz Perseus recordings of the first and last
> >>> : evenings and most of the 2nd but only during the Luxembourg
> portion. I
> >>> : certainly didn't notice any anomalies but am curious....
> >>>
> >>> I received an e-mail regarding HAARP activities around:
> >>>
> >>> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 19:33 (US West Coast Time)
> >>> Subject: [HCDX] HAARP tests
> >>>
> >>> At which time I entered the two frequencies into my receiver and
> switched
> >>> betwen them as one frequency stopped and the other started. 2800 was
> >> quite
> >>> strong, 3300 very weak at my location in Central Nevada.
> >>>
> >>> Kurt
> >>>
> >>> ______________________________________________________________
> >>> Spooks mailing list
> >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks
> >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> >>> Post: mailto:Spooks at mailman.qth.net
> >>>
> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >>>
> >>> ______________________________________________________________
> >>> Spooks mailing list
> >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks
> >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> >>> Post: mailto:Spooks at mailman.qth.net
> >>>
> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >> ______________________________________________________________
> >> Spooks mailing list
> >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks
> >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> >> Post: mailto:Spooks at mailman.qth.net
> >>
> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >>
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > Spooks mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:Spooks at mailman.qth.net
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ______________________________________________________________
> Spooks mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Spooks at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
More information about the Spooks
mailing list