[Spooks] FIRST QUESTION ON NS

[Gian Romani]

Ciao Carl and many thanks for you reply.
For what about a hendeld receiver my reccomendation is Degen model
DE1103, its price is about 50 dollars, you can buy it everywhere in
the web, and its performances are very cool. I'm using a Tecsun PL600
and it's really not bad.
ciao

2014/1/24 Carl Hadley <carl.hadley at me.com>:
> Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list
>
> HI,
>
> Your question and opinion seem perfectly logical to me, and i am sure that a co-ordinated effort is easily managed given todays technology and the ability to communicate worldwide within seconds via various instant messaging programs. Listeners could easily confirm reception and non reception areas of any given transmission.
>
> On a separate note i am currently in the market for a new handheld receiver does anyone have a recommendation of make and model i should look at?
> Best Regards
>
> Carl Lawrence Hadley
>
> Cell:    +351 91 525 2082
> Email: carl.hadley at me.com
>
>
>
>
>
> On 24 Jan 2014, at 12:17, Gian Romani <romanigian at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list
>>
>> Good morning. This is my first question:
>> It has been said many times, and now is given to established, that
>> these transmissions are to be received by agents located throughout
>> the area and that one of the strengths of this system of communication
>> of messages is the fact of not having to use special devices to be
>> able to receive. Infact, as we have always said, we just need a
>> shortwave radio, cheap, small and convenient, that does not arouse
>> suspicion. I noticed that in many cases it goes on the hunt for signs
>> of Numbers Stations with instrumentation, and especially antennas,
>> complex and huge, which will surely help to receive distant signals
>> but in my opinion are not logical to use for receipt of NS. That is, I
>> mean, to understand exactly where they come from and who they are
>> eventually destined for the messages, it is useless to resort to huge
>> antennas and professional receivers because I think that we don't have
>> to hunt for the signal to reach the source, we don't have to go as far
>> as possible, but we have to let the signals come to us. Agents who
>> have to receive messages don't use professional receivers and big
>> antennas to wire all over the garden or on the roof. If it's true that
>> agents use little receivers and antennas, with similar devices
>> monitors have to try to find the signals. It is obvious that a SWL
>> with such powerful devices can hear even really far signals, but this
>> is not in the intention of NS programmes. The sense of NS, if we want
>> to understand something more, is to receive them with the same devices
>> used by agents. A signal sent for example from Russia for agents
>> located in Italy is easily receivable with professional receivers and
>> wire antennas cut for the right band. But to understand exactly who it
>> is for that message need trying with domestic receivers and antennas.
>> If the signal is perfectly received all over Italy it means that
>> signal is potentially routed to agents in Italy. If in Italy, with
>> domestic devices, that signal is not receivable, it means that message
>> is not intended to agents in that area. To try to understand where
>> they came from but also where they have to go then is useful to try to
>> do triangulations reception operated by monitors located everywhere
>> and can operate with the same home equipment. Just so we can groped to
>> identify areas of sending/receiving messages. It is correct my idea?
>> Do you agree with this point of view?
>>
>> Bye, Naig
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Spooks mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Spooks at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Spooks mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Spooks at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html