[Spooks] HAM Stuff [was: Re: Lincolnshire poacher]

[Ted Van Beurden]

Wouldn't be any point.  A shortwave receiver covers more freqs (unless things have changed) and should receive just as well as a ham receiver.  Unless you just want to listen to hams. Just my view.
 
Iyi geceler, 
Ted in Turkey

 
> From: ccselene7 at earthlink.net
> To: spooks at mailman.qth.net
> Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:22:30 -0700
> Subject: Re: [Spooks] HAM Stuff [was: Re: Lincolnshire poacher]
> 
> Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list
> 
> In the United States, yes.
> 
> Carole
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Parrish S. Knight" <pianodwarf at gmail.com>
> To: "Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations" <spooks at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 11:18 AM
> Subject: [Spooks] HAM Stuff [was: Re: Lincolnshire poacher]
> 
> 
> Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list
> 
> Is it lawful to own HAM radio gear without a license so long as you don’t use it to transmit, only to receive?
> ______________________________________________________________
> Spooks mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Spooks at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Spooks mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Spooks at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html