[Spooks] THE WATCHERS: The Rise of America’s Surveillance State
Al Fansome
al_fansome at hotmail.com
Mon Mar 1 12:24:44 EST 2010
The New York Times
February 23, 2010
Books of The Times
The
People We Pay to Look Over Our Shoulders
By ERIC LICHTBLAU
THE WATCHERS
The Rise of America’s Surveillance State
By Shane Harris
Illustrated. 418 pages. Penguin Press. $27.95.
At this very moment analysts at the National Security Agency some 30 miles
north of the White House are monitoring countless flashpoints of data —
cellphone calls to “hot” numbers, an e-mail message on a suspicious
server, an oddly worded tweet — as they carom around the globe like
pinballs in cyberspace.
The snippets of information could conceivably lead them to Anwar al-Awlaki, a fugitive cleric in Yemen
whose fiery sermons have inspired violent jihadists. Or to the next
would-be underwear bomber. Or, much more likely in the
needle-in-a-haystack world of cyber detection, it might lead to nothing
at all — at least nothing of any consequence in determining Al Qaeda’s
next target.
This is the world of modern eavesdropping, or
signals intelligence, as its adherents call it, and for many years it
operated in the shadows. “The Puzzle Palace,” the 1983 best seller by
James Bamford that remains the benchmark study of the N.S.A., first
pulled back the curtain to provide a glint of unwanted sunlight on the
place. And the years after the Sept. 11 attacks — a period in which the
surveillance agencies’ muscular new role would lead to secret
wiretapping programs inside the United States, expansive data-mining
operations and more — gave rise to public scrutiny that made the place a
veritable greenhouse of exposure.
As each operation has come to
light, an anxious public has wanted to know whether this powerful new
surveillance model was undermining traditional notions of privacy and
civil liberties. Just whom is the government watching? And who is
watching the watchers? Nominally, the answer is all three branches of
government: a secret court that approves surveillance warrants,
Congressional oversight committees and the intelligence agencies
themselves are supposed to be policing the spy-catchers to guard against
abuses.
But this rarely amounted to what lawmakers like to call
“vigorous oversight”; in the Bush administration, in fact, the
surveillance court and the oversight committees were intentionally
bypassed on the most sensitive programs. More often, it has been left to
outsiders — journalists, authors, civil rights advocates and privacy
groups — to keep tabs on the watchers and to bring public scrutiny to
once-secret programs. Indeed, it was outside scrutiny that brought
attention to many of those at the heart of the debate, from Total
Information Awareness, created after 9/11 to President George W. Bush’s
warrantless wiretapping.
For the spymasters, this spotlight was
decidedly unwelcome. “The fact that we’re doing it this way,” Mike
McConnell, a director of intelligence in the Bush administration, said a
few years ago in the midst of the fierce public debate over government
surveillance powers, “means that some Americans are going to die.” Mr.
McConnell is one of the recurring characters in “The Watchers: The Rise
of America’s Surveillance State” by Shane Harris, but this is not a book
that Mr. McConnell is likely to rush out to buy. Mr. Harris, with some
success, does what Mr. McConnell and others in the intelligence world
have found so objectionable: he watches the watchers.
While Mr.
Harris’s examination covers a fair amount of ground that has already
been well plowed, it uses smart technical analysis and crisp writing to
put the reader inside the room with the watchers and to help better
understand the mind-set that gave rise to the modern surveillance state.
“We have never lived in a time,” Mr. Harris writes, “when the
government has had such remarkable technological ability to watch its
own citizens.”
The unlikely tour guide for this journey into the
netherworld of surveillance operations is John M. Poindexter, the
retired Navy admiral and former national security adviser who was the
driving force behind the Total Information Awareness program, which
would become a potent symbol of government overreach soon after 9/11.
Mr. Harris, who writes about surveillance issues for National Journal,
interviewed Admiral Poindexter 14 times in researching his book, and the
insight into the intellectual framework that guided him provides one of
the strengths of the book.
Following “15 years in the
wilderness,” after Admiral Poindexter’s involvement in the Iran-contra
affair during the Reagan administration, Mr. Harris writes, he returned
to government in 2002 as the point man in the effort to develop a
data-mining program at the Pentagon that could put together all the
disparate pieces of intelligence data — communications, travel, finances
and more — to “connect the dots” and prevent another calamitous attack
after 9/11. But soon enough a public outcry over the research program
led Congress to cut off funding.
But the approach has outlived
the controversy. As Mr. Harris first described in detail in National
Journal in 2006, the remnants of that effort were simply repackaged and
parceled out to other agencies, principally the N.S.A.
At its
best “The Watchers” provides an insightful glimpse into how Washington
works and how ideas are marketed and sold in the back rooms of power,
whether the product being peddled is widgets or a radical model for
intelligence gathering. Mr. Harris takes the reader along in 2002 as
Admiral Poindexter goes from office to office at the Pentagon and the
White House, seeking allies for his fledgling intelligence project,
putting on PowerPoint presentations, finding agencies willing to link
their data to Total Information Awareness, navigating potential legal
pitfalls and hearing cautionary tales about previous ventures into data
mining, like the F.B.I.’s Carnivore e-mail program a few years earlier.
“Learn
from their example,” Fran Townsend, a senior intelligence official,
tells Admiral Poindexter of the Carnivore debacle. “Don’t make the same
mistakes.”
Unfortunately, the book suffers at times from the same
Achilles’ heel that plagued Admiral Poindexter: in picking his targets,
Mr. Harris — like the watchers themselves — sometimes veers off the
mark in determining where to look and in separating the important from
the trivial. He spends too much time and ink going down rabbit holes,
examining in great detail operations like Able Danger, a data-mining
program at the Pentagon that became briefly notorious because of the
erroneous claim by a few military officials who worked on it that it had
been able to identify Mohammed Atta, the 9/11 hijacker, as a possible
threat before the attacks.
Even the examination of the Total
Information Awareness program, as richly detailed as it is, proves a bit
of a red herring. Mr. Harris acknowledges that Admiral Poindexter was
seeking to do the type of data mining that the N.S.A. had already been
doing, and would continue to do, on a much broader scale. Yet
information about how the N.S.A. has been using is new data-mining tools
— a difficult target, to be sure — is in short supply.
Meanwhile,
largely unanswered is a core question surrounding the new surveillance
model and the fancy data-mining algorithms that come with it. Does this
stuff really work? Can data-mining tools originally developed to find
Las Vegas card counters and cheats actually identify would-be
terrorists? When the question is addressed, the results are
discouraging. Mr. Harris recounts one test run by the N.S.A. of the
tools that Admiral Poindexter had developed: “The T.I.A. tools crashed.
They were simply incapable of processing so much information in real
time. Like balloons affixed to a fire hydrant, they burst.”
The watchers, it seems, have plenty to watch. The problem is that much of
the time, they may not know what they’re looking at.
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469228/direct/01/
More information about the Spooks
mailing list