[Spooks] UNID on 3630 kHz ?

[Zack Widup]

Hmm ... I don't know. I'll see if I can hear it and try to determine
what it is and possibly decode it.

Back in the 70's when we were all using RTTY mechanical teleprinters
like the Model 28, we used to send pictures via RTTY that took hours
to transmit. I remember some of us forgot to insert ID's every 10
minutes into the transmissions.
:-)

73, Zack

2010/2/2 Pavel Troller <patrol at sinus.cz>:
> Hi Zack,
>  I know that hams are very inventive and that they are testing various
> technologies, which may be strange and unobvious, but one thing here is
> very atypical for the amateur traffic, and maybe even in the contrary to
> the ham-spirit: the frequency was occupied by one, single, continuous
> transmission for at least two hours, for which I listened to it. There
> was not even a smallest interruption. I had to turn my radio off because
> my children went sleep and the sound would disturb them, while the
> broadcast (yes, it was really a broadcast, not a typical amateur QSO)
> was still on. Now I'm already listening on the frequency, curious, whether
> it will be there again.
>  With regards, Pavel.
>
>> Hams keep coming up with new digi modes. We had Clover, then PSK31,
>> then PSK16, MFSK16, Feld-Hell, then Olivia, ...
>>
>> Not to mention JASON, WOLF, WSPR on the lower frequencies ...
>>
>> I have no doubt people will continue to come up with new ones. I'm not
>> too active on the digi modes and I'm not on any digi reflectors, so I
>> don't know what new ones are around now. But with the frequency given,
>> I'd be 99% sure it is a radio amateur.
>>
>> Zack
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Pavel Troller <patrol at sinus.cz> wrote:
>> > Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list
>> >
>> > Hi!
>> >  yes, it is one of the possible explanations, but the used modulation/
>> > encoding is rather unusual. I've heard SSTV as well as various facsimile
>> > transmissions many times and it never appeared like this. But the progress
>> > which the signal was udergoing over the time seemed like a slightly changing
>> > scene on a video, i.e. not static pictures as on SSTV but a really changing
>> > video stream.
>> >  Regards, Pavel.
>> >>
>> >> I took a listen and I think it is slow scan tv! although it is weird!
>> >>
>> >> Ernie
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:36 PM, KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk at earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from
>> >> > this list
>> >> >
>> >> > Although SSTV is permitted there, it is the center frequency for DV
>> >> > (digital
>> >> > voice) or "Vocoders".
>> >> >
>> >> > Kurt
>> >> >
>> >> > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> >
>> >> > : Contrary to what I said in my previous mail, I don't think that it is a
>> >> > vocoder.
>> >> > : I have the signal very loud on my radio now. I have no idea what it is
>> >> > actually.
>> >> >
>> >> > ______________________________________________________________
>> >> > Spooks mailing list
>> >> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks
>> >> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> >> > Post: mailto:Spooks at mailman.qth.net
>> >> >
>> >> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> >> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> >> >
>> >> ______________________________________________________________
>> >> Spooks mailing list
>> >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks
>> >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> >> Post: mailto:Spooks at mailman.qth.net
>> >>
>> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> > ______________________________________________________________
>> > Spooks mailing list
>> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks
>> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> > Post: mailto:Spooks at mailman.qth.net
>> >
>> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> >
>