[Spooks] LET'S GET BACK ON TOPIC PLEASE!

[SKaReCRoW]

Sorry about that, I wasn't planning on replying to that anymore
anyway.  I'm not trying to argue at all, but it is somewhat on topic
to discuss what radios can and can't pick up freq's that regularly
have numbers.  Didn't mean for the conversation to go on so long
though...  I guess I was just excited to be back on the mailing list,
I first joined right after Sept 11th, but for some reason stopped
receiving messages quite some time ago.  Anyway, it's good to be back,
and I'll try to keep it on topic from now on.

About the quoting of previous messages...  If any of that was me, I
sincerely appologize.  Gmail's interface is so poor that most of the
time you can't even tell what's being quoted in a reply.  Google has
to do some serious work unless they plan on going under soon.

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:49:58 -0400, mslaten <mslaten at prodigy.net> wrote:
> 
> Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list
> 
> Hi Group:
> 
>     Recently the thread "Question about spy numbers" has been taking up a
> tremendous amount of space on this list.  The truth is, there is very little
> information regarding numbers stations and tons of information regarding
> receivers, scanners, etc.  There are other lists which deal with these
> subjects, for those who are interested.
>     In addition, submitters do not have the courtesy to delete extraneous
> posts when they reply to them and cause a real waste of paper and time
> sifting through the posts.
>     Could we please get back to the intent of this list, and report "numbers
> stations" related information to the list?  It would really be great to see
> 19 pages of numbers intercepts listed, instead of 19 pages of off topic
> information from just 3 posts regarding "Question about numbers stations",
> which I recently downloaded in "Spooks Digest, Vol 5, Issue 32.
>     Thank you.
> 
> 73's
> Mark
> 

-- 
 -- SKaReCRoW
I'm out like a fat girl playin dodgeball be-otch!