[SOC] SOC web site hacked!

[Cristiano]

a masterpiece.
Il 11/Giu/2015 03:29, "Ray Day" <rayday at cox.net> ha scritto:

> Hmmmmm......
>
> How about: "We're NOT the FOC. We're the SOC. If you don't understand that,
> you're in the right place. If you do understand that, you're in the wrong
> place."
>
> Now we're up to $0.04,
> 73,
> Ray N6HE
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SOC [mailto:soc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Curt Steger
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 6:09 PM
> To: Second Class Operators' Club
> Subject: Re: [SOC] SOC web site hacked!
>
> I too noticed this and wondered what sort of witchcraft was involved.
> Apparently someone from the club that shall not be named was feeling a
> little butt-hurt about something maybe. Lord knows they would never be
> intimidated by such a humble gathering as this.
>
> I would prefer a much more subtle disclaimer that what the SOC currently
> has. Something like,
>
> Not associated with any other class of operators club, now get over it.
>
> Just my $.02 worth.
>
> Curt - NA7CS
>
> On 6/10/2015 3:25 PM, Quikhooligan via SOC wrote:
> > Honorable SOC members,
> >
> > I don't check the SOC web site very often.  I had my fill of
> > frustration the first time I visited there and never could find the
> > button. I had to be manually added to the membership roster by one of the
> club officers.
> >   So now, years later, I muster up enough courage to check the web
> > site again.  And it's a good thing I checked.  The web site appears to
> > have been hacked!  The web site appears mostly as it appeared years
> > ago but there was a line added smack dab in the middle of the page
> > with a RED font! It says:
> >
> > --> Not associated with the First Class CW Operators Club nor meant in
> > any way to defame FOC <--
> >
> > Even Second Class Operators know that the SOC is not the FOC.  We're
> > not that dumb!
> >
> > And as far as not defaming FOC, was this possibly official SOC club
> > position ever submitted to a vote?  Yes, I might vote to approve such
> > a statement on the SOC web page but only if the FOC posts a similar
> > statement on their web site saying :
> >
> > --> Not associated with the Second Class Operators Club nor meant in
> > --> any
> > way to defame SOC <--
> >
> > I checked.  You would think that in consideration of fairness, that
> > the statement would be there already.  Instead, for all to see on the
> > bottom of their page is this disclaimer:
> >
> >   "No part of this website may be reproduced or used externally
> > without the express consent of FOC."
> >
> > So why doesn't SOC have this nasty disclaimer on its web site?  I'll
> > tell you why.  We're nice guys (and gals).  All we have on the bottom
> > of our main page is this:
> >
> > "This WEB Site has received the prestigious Barney Award"
> >
> > Barney Awards are nicer than unfriendly legal disclaimers.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > SOC mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:SOC at mailman.qth.net
> > Message delivered to csteger515 at gmail.com
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email
> > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> SOC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:SOC at mailman.qth.net
> Message delivered to rayday at cox.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> SOC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:SOC at mailman.qth.net
> Message delivered to iz0ien at gmail.com
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>