[SOC] Are You Qualified for SOC?
Jim Reicher
w0hv at sbcglobal.net
Mon Oct 3 17:20:31 EDT 2011
So you're saying you're not really a ham?
----- Original Message ----
> From: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk at earthlink.net>
> To: Second Class Operators' Club <soc at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Sun, October 2, 2011 8:41:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [SOC] Are You Qualified for SOC?
>
> "Having said that, take your political rants"
>
> No political rant, just a statement based on facts presented, please reread:
>
> "You didn't like that crappy attempt that was published a few months ago?
> 1980's security paper of one color with poorly aligned text from another
> type of paper of a different color pasted into the boxes? It might look
> real, as in "REAL"y bad from a distance, but a casual glance indicated it
> was fabricated crap. It wasn't even a decent attempt, unlike all those
> HAARP charts I altered."
>
> AND to keep it on topic, the paper used in the fake certificate was the same
> type used by the FCC for my Ham license in 1994.
>
> Kurt
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> SOC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:SOC at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
More information about the SOC
mailing list