[SOC] Are You Qualified for SOC?

Peter Clough peteclough at aol.com
Sun Oct 2 20:37:47 EDT 2011


I noticed the dullards and Grouch's have 



-----Original Message-----
From: john bell <f5vhc at free.fr>
To: Art - W6KY <W6KY at yahoo.com>; Second Class Operators' Club <soc at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sun, Oct 2, 2011 2:49 am
Subject: Re: [SOC] Are You Qualified for SOC?


Aaaaaah can there be no fun?

On 02/10/2011 07:09, Art - W6KY wrote:
> K0HB Wrote:
>
> I'm no fan of the person who currently holds the Office of President of the
> United States.
>
> Having said that, take your political rants and jeremiads to some other
> reflector.  SOC is an Amateur Radio group, not a politicians group.
>
> Thank you.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> W6KY Wrote:
>
> Ya Could Have Fooled Me!
>
> 73, Art
>   .............................................
> The problems we face today are there
> because the people who work for a living
> are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Radio K0HB<kzerohb at gmail.com>
> To: Second Class Operators' Club<soc at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Sat, October 1, 2011 9:53:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [SOC] Are You Qualified for SOC?
>
> I'm no fan of the person who currently holds the Office of President of the
> United States.
>
> Having said that, take your political rants and jeremiads to some other
> reflector.  SOC is an Amateur Radio group, not a politicians group.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: KD7JYK DM09
> Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 2:16 AM
> To: soc at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [SOC] Are You Qualified for SOC?
>
> : 8. What was the President’s Name in 1975?
> : Who the hell knows, since he's never released an authentic, verifiable
> birth certificate...
>
> You didn't like that crappy attempt that was published a few months ago?
> 1980's security paper of one color with poorly aligned text from another
> type of paper of a different color pasted into the boxes?  It might look
> real, as in "REAL"y bad from a distance, but a casual glance indicated it
> was fabricated crap.  It wasn't even a decent attempt, unlike all those
> HAARP charts I altered.
>
> Kurt
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> SOC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:SOC at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> SOC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:SOC at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> SOC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:SOC at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
SOC mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:SOC at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

 


More information about the SOC mailing list