[SOC] 56's or whatever

[David Evans]

Sorry!

I assumed (soc) that no one knew where it was. As some QTHs have long names taking the maidenhead (pun) into its place would save some amount of key bashing/wrist flicking.

As is SOC I didn't think it through - NNNNNN is obviously the way forward. There may be a drawback?

NNN

David G0EVA
SOC# 988; EPC# 15902

"competence is tolerated - not encouraged"
-----Original Message-----
From: soc-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:soc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Quikhooligan
Sent: 24 November 2011 06:03
To: Second Class Operators' Club
Subject: Re: [SOC] 56's or whatever

David Evans wrote:
> NAME IS x  QTH IO93FQ U R Sig nnn GUD DX 
> 
> NNN
> 
> Works for me!

QTH IO93FQ? Where ever that might be. Might just as well say "QTH is
NNNNNN."
______________________________________________________________
SOC mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:SOC at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html