[SOC] 56s

[David Evans]

I did not expect that this would catch on.

It seems that "it's the though that counts" which is the important factor.  I like the fact that you can only count to 1 - very SOC.  

I make no assumption about the value expressed by the value expressed - it is just above half way between plus and minus infinity.

767 (59x13)s to everyone who takes this up!

David G0EVA
SOC# 988; EPC# 15902

"competence is tolerated - not encouraged"

-----Original Message-----
From: soc-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:soc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Michael Coslo
Sent: 21 November 2011 13:29
To: Second Class Operators' Club
Subject: Re: [SOC] 56s


On Nov 21, 2011, at 6:06 AM, David Evans wrote:

> My suggestion for "all the Good Numbers" might lead to some confusion if operators just pick one at random.


I like.

Most very best 1's to all.


Every once in a while on our local repeater, we'll get into a "That's a big roger" or even 10-4 jag on the air. All in the name of acting goofy.

Sort of a welcome change from what seems to be the controlling attitude of a lot of Hams.


N3LI for ID
______________________________________________________________
SOC mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:SOC at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html