[SOC] Fw: "'Master' and 'Slave' Computer Labels Unacceptable, Officials Say."

[Jim F.]

is very funny
you posted
what
I think
Hank,


--- On Tue, 9/21/10, hank k8dd <k8dd at arrl.net> wrote:


From: hank k8dd <k8dd at arrl.net>
Subject: Re: [SOC] Fw: "'Master' and 'Slave' Computer Labels Unacceptable, Officials Say."
To: "Second Class Operators' Club" <soc at mailman.qth.net>
Date: Tuesday, September 21, 2010, 9:41 AM


On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:14 AM, KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> And yet they fail to define "Master/Slave", why and to whom it may be
> considered offensive...  Maybe the vendor was just talking about computer
> components...
>
> Next, "Top/Bottom".
>
> Taint no big deal, taint no big thing...
>
> Kurt
>
>


Top/Bottom
Time to drag out my old signature that got me in deep dodo on another list!

72     #69


---
Think about it .....
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
---
______________________________________________________________
SOC mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:SOC at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html