[SOC] HAARP

[S.Nordenstroem]

Yes Charlie it is, the problem is the direction is vertical! Megawatts 
shooting straight up in order to ionize the higher layers and then use 
that "mirror" to reflect signals from completely different sources to 
extend the range. An artificial meteor scatter.

Sam
HS0ZDY


On 4/10/2010 7:30 AM, Charles Harpole wrote:
> HAARP RF is reputed to be directional.
>
> Charles Harpole
> k4vud at hotmail.com
>
>
>
>    
>> From: n7xy at clearwire.net
>> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:06:54 -0700
>> To: soc at mailman.qth.net
>> Subject: Re: [SOC] HAARP
>>
>>
>> On Apr 9, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Fred Jensen wrote:
>>
>>      
>>> Activity begets activity.  10 isn't totally dead these days, it just
>>> sounds that way because everyone goes there, listens for a few
>>> minutes,
>>> and leaves.
>>>        
>> I recall listening (from Southern California) to 10 around 25-30
>> years ago and the only station heard was a beacon on an island in the
>> Indian Ocean.  I alternately called CQ and listened for 15-20 minutes
>> and there was still only the beacon.  Oh, well.
>>
>> 73, Bob N7XY
>> SOC #77
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> SOC mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:SOC at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>      
>   		 	   		
> ______________________________________________________________
> SOC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:SOC at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>