[SOC] In True SOC Style

[Kevin Rock]

Two good days in a row and you're treading on very thin ice!
   Kevin.



-----Original Message-----
>From: "Mike Besemer (WM4B)" <mwbesemer at cox.net>
>Sent: Mar 5, 2007 10:08 PM
>To: 'Kevin Rock' <kevinrock at earthlink.net>, 'Second Class Operators' Club' <soc at mailman.qth.net>
>Subject: RE: [SOC] In True SOC Style
>
>Hey... c'mon guys!  Even the worst of us can have a good day now and then!
>
>-- de WM4B
>Mike
>Kathleen, GA
>#169
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: soc-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:soc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On
>Behalf Of Kevin Rock
>Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 10:05 PM
>To: Second Class Operators' Club
>Subject: RE: [SOC] In True SOC Style
>
>This guy is obviously too deep for the group.  We could run him out of town
>on a rail but Mr. Lincoln said, "If it weren't for the honor of the thing
>I'd just as soon walk."  We have a conundrum.  Is philosophy allowed in SOC
>or should we limit our thinking to more mundane matters?  Such as figuring
>out how many dits in the optimal 'B'.  Somewhere between two and six as far
>as I can tell.
>   Kevin.  KD5ONS
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>>From: "Mike Besemer (WM4B)" <mwbesemer at cox.net>
>>Sent: Mar 5, 2007 9:20 PM
>>To: k6dgw at foothill.net, 'Second Class Operators' Club'
><soc at mailman.qth.net>
>>Subject: RE: [SOC] In True SOC Style
>>
>>If you know you're SOC... are you really SOC?
>>
>>-- de WM4B
>>Mike
>>Kathleen, GA
>>#169
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: soc-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:soc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On
>>Behalf Of Fred Jensen
>>Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 8:00 PM
>>To: Second Class Operators' Club
>>Subject: Re: [SOC] In True SOC Style
>>
>>Lantz, Vann wrote:
>>> First, let me say hello to everyone.  I'm Vann, K4VGL, and SOC# 736.
>>> Apparently, the application committee was busily setting up their
>>> equipment for the weekend of contesting to come when my application was
>>> approved.
>>>  
>>> I played in the ARRL Int DX contest this weekend.  In true SOC style, I
>>> could only scrape up 8970 points.  I was working a barefoot 100 watts,
>>> multi-band vertical, and no filters.  Second class all the way!  HiHiHi.
>>
>>Vann,
>>
>>You've missed the point here.  You made a QSO.  Actually, you made 
>>several.  Be veeeerrry careful, you could outdistance the SOC "maximum 
>>standards."
>>
>>Welcome!  We thrive on our failures, misteaks, and occasional attempts 
>>at competence.  Don't worry about your equipment, antennas, filters, or 
>>proximity of the fridge to your rig.  Once SOC, always SOC.
>>
>>79,
>>
>>Fred K6DGW
>>- Northern California Contest Club
>>- CU in the 2007 CQP Oct 6-7
>>- www.cqp.org
>>_______________________________________________
>>SOC mailing list
>>SOC at mailman.qth.net
>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
>>
>>Mailman: User Guide for List Subscribers
>>http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>SOC mailing list
>>SOC at mailman.qth.net
>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
>>
>>Mailman: User Guide for List Subscribers
>>http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>
>_______________________________________________
>SOC mailing list
>SOC at mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
>
>Mailman: User Guide for List Subscribers
>http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>SOC mailing list
>SOC at mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
>
>Mailman: User Guide for List Subscribers
>http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm