[SOC] In True SOC Style
Mike Besemer (WM4B)
mwbesemer at cox.net
Mon Mar 5 22:08:48 EST 2007
Hey... c'mon guys! Even the worst of us can have a good day now and then!
-- de WM4B
Mike
Kathleen, GA
#169
-----Original Message-----
From: soc-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:soc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On
Behalf Of Kevin Rock
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 10:05 PM
To: Second Class Operators' Club
Subject: RE: [SOC] In True SOC Style
This guy is obviously too deep for the group. We could run him out of town
on a rail but Mr. Lincoln said, "If it weren't for the honor of the thing
I'd just as soon walk." We have a conundrum. Is philosophy allowed in SOC
or should we limit our thinking to more mundane matters? Such as figuring
out how many dits in the optimal 'B'. Somewhere between two and six as far
as I can tell.
Kevin. KD5ONS
-----Original Message-----
>From: "Mike Besemer (WM4B)" <mwbesemer at cox.net>
>Sent: Mar 5, 2007 9:20 PM
>To: k6dgw at foothill.net, 'Second Class Operators' Club'
<soc at mailman.qth.net>
>Subject: RE: [SOC] In True SOC Style
>
>If you know you're SOC... are you really SOC?
>
>-- de WM4B
>Mike
>Kathleen, GA
>#169
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: soc-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:soc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On
>Behalf Of Fred Jensen
>Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 8:00 PM
>To: Second Class Operators' Club
>Subject: Re: [SOC] In True SOC Style
>
>Lantz, Vann wrote:
>> First, let me say hello to everyone. I'm Vann, K4VGL, and SOC# 736.
>> Apparently, the application committee was busily setting up their
>> equipment for the weekend of contesting to come when my application was
>> approved.
>>
>> I played in the ARRL Int DX contest this weekend. In true SOC style, I
>> could only scrape up 8970 points. I was working a barefoot 100 watts,
>> multi-band vertical, and no filters. Second class all the way! HiHiHi.
>
>Vann,
>
>You've missed the point here. You made a QSO. Actually, you made
>several. Be veeeerrry careful, you could outdistance the SOC "maximum
>standards."
>
>Welcome! We thrive on our failures, misteaks, and occasional attempts
>at competence. Don't worry about your equipment, antennas, filters, or
>proximity of the fridge to your rig. Once SOC, always SOC.
>
>79,
>
>Fred K6DGW
>- Northern California Contest Club
>- CU in the 2007 CQP Oct 6-7
>- www.cqp.org
>_______________________________________________
>SOC mailing list
>SOC at mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
>
>Mailman: User Guide for List Subscribers
>http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>
>_______________________________________________
>SOC mailing list
>SOC at mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
>
>Mailman: User Guide for List Subscribers
>http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
_______________________________________________
SOC mailing list
SOC at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
Mailman: User Guide for List Subscribers
http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
More information about the SOC
mailing list