[SOC] i,j and ...

[Paul T. Antos]

Not universally true. I'm sure anybody with a K - prefix would disagree, 
although I know a few who fall into that category.

WB2ABD

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Hill" <rehill at ix.netcom.com>
To: "Second Class Operators' Club" <soc at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: [SOC] i,j and ...


> Because 'K' is the end.   _ . _
>
> Rich
> NU6T
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Paul T. Antos" <wb2abd at roadrunner.com>
> To: <SOC at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 7:46 PM
> Subject: [SOC] i,j and ...
>
>
> When I retired from teaching Math for 30 years, I was really looking 
> forward to not having to deal with imaginary numbers and vector notation , 
> unless it was absolutely necessary to enter the Happy Beyond.  But as long 
> as you guys insist on bringing this stuff up,  why has  k  been left out 
> of the discussion?
>
> Paul WB2ABD   SOC 7i + 6j + 4k  ( aka sqrt 101 )
> _______________________________________________
> SOC mailing list
> SOC at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
>
> Mailman: User Guide for List Subscribers
> http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SOC mailing list
> SOC at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
>
> Mailman: User Guide for List Subscribers
> http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>