[SOC] Am I a ham?
David J. Ring, Jr.
n1ea at arrl.net
Tue Nov 21 16:50:26 EST 2006
On the main ULS page, you will see the FCC archive site link - you can
search here also - but when searching select "No Criteria" or the search
won't work.
I believe that only records back 12 years are kept - and years are pruned
monthly.
What used to be in the archives for my licenses and those of my family are
no longer in the archives - they've been pruned.
I only see entries for myself (I have several licenses) going back to 1994.
So the ULS won't show you when you were first licensed - but you know that
already - but it seems to have stumped you - excellent SOC thinking!
I will try to better you - even though "one upmanship" isn't what SOC do
because we always come in second, but I digress.
I want to find my birth certificate to see if I was born!
Does that qualify me for SOC?
73
David N1EA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian - KB9BVN" <kb9bvn at earthlink.net>
To: "Second Class Operators' Club" <soc at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: [SOC] Am I a ham?
Can ULS tell me when I was first licensed?
I searched my call but it only goes back to 1998 when I upgraded to General.
I was first licensed as KB9BVN in 1987 or 1988
----- Original Message -----
From: "Reicher, James" <JReicher at hrblock.com>
To: "Second Class Operators' Club" <soc at mailman.qth.net>; <thom2 at att.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 3:13 PM
Subject: RE: [SOC] Am I a ham?
Here's what the ULS has to say:
http://wtbwww05.fcc.gov/default.sph/DwQLic.exe?FNC=go_main__Alic_list_re
sults_html___1272557.0
Congrats! You're a ham, at least for another year or so.
73 de N8AU, Jim in Raymore, MO
-----Original Message-----
From: soc-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:soc-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of David J. Ring, Jr.
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 1:45 PM
To: Second Class Operators' Club; thom2 at att.net
Subject: Re: [SOC] Am I a ham?
Tom,
I reread your license - I was more interested in the dates.
You should go to the ULS and log in and then when you get to the license
manager, you will see on the right side - "REQUEST DUPLICATE LICENSE" -
which is what you should do.
Even though the "real" license is the appearance of the license on the
FCC
web page, for practical reasons the paper copy is considered what is
needed
by VEC and others. Several years ago this was changed - prior to that
the
"real" license was the paper. Now it isn't the paper at all.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ralph T. Stetson III" <kd1r at arrl.net>
To: "Second Class Operators' Club" <soc at mailman.qth.net>;
<thom2 at att.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [SOC] Am I a ham?
Well Tom should you complete the study process before you agtually renew
your ticket.
You will need to produce and orginal signed License. Most VE sites are
not
set up to search the FRN data base and as such we are limited to the
orginal
paper sent to you. We can make photocopies of thr orginal and submit
them
so you can keep the ticket for your scrap book.
Good Luck in your upgrade pursuit you will not find yourself wanting for
SOC
company as an Amatuer Extra Class Ham.
We SOC are everywhere...
Ralph Stetson, KD1R
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom McCulloch" <thom2 at att.net>
_______________________________________________
SOC mailing list
SOC at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
Mailman: User Guide for List Subscribers
http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
_______________________________________________
SOC mailing list
SOC at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
Mailman: User Guide for List Subscribers
http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
_______________________________________________
SOC mailing list
SOC at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
Mailman: User Guide for List Subscribers
http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.14.11/543 - Release Date: 11/20/2006
9:20 PM
More information about the SOC
mailing list