[SOC] OT: PSK-31 Worked All States: Is anybody out there?

[Neal Enault]

I would think that a true SOC approach would be to work them on
echolink, while throwing "PSK-31" into the qso several times, and
having PSK-31 running in the background.  I know an attorney who could
defend that position, but he won't be out for a few more years.

Neal #625 WA6OCP

--- Fred Jensen <k6dgw at foothill.net> wrote:

> Hmmm ... I was informed that for SOC members, it is OK to work all
> the 
> states by chance, but you just can't count them.  I guess the result
> is 
> the same.
> 
> Fred K6DGW
> Auburn CA CM98lw
> 
> Mike Besemer (WM4B) wrote:
> > I think it's okay if you have to BEG for contacts.  Working them
> simply by
> > chance is definitely not allowed!
> > 
> > -- de WM4B
> > Mike
> > Kathleen, GA
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: soc-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:soc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On
> > Behalf Of Reicher, James
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 11:50 AM
> > To: Second Class Operators' Club
> > Subject: RE: [SOC] OT: PSK-31 Worked All States: Is anybody out
> there?
> > 
> > Excuse me, but I don't believe that SOC members can hold PSK-31
> WAS.
> > Isn't this an automatic disqualification?
> > 
> > 73 de N8AU, Jim in Raymore, MO
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: soc-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:soc-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
> > On Behalf Of Mike Besemer (WM4B)
> > Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 1:05 PM
> > To: soc at mailman.qth.net
> > Subject: [SOC] OT: PSK-31 Worked All States: Is anybody out there?
> > 
> > Greetings all,
> > 
> > I'm trying to finish off my PSK-31 WAS and am missing QSO's with 9
> > states
> > (plus 5 more worked but unconfirmed).  Several of these states
> SHOULD be
> > easy pickin's, but I just haven't had any luck yet.  Of course, we
> > worked
> > many of these states on field day (using my call), but I don't feel
> > right
> > about using field day contacts for my WAS.  
> > 
> > (Of course I realize that this is a bit OT for SOC, but the fact
> that
> > I'm
> > posting an OT post, begging for contacts is pretty much SOC in
> itself,
> > don't
> > you think?)
> > 
> > At any rate, if any of you are out there in the following states
> that I
> > haven't worked and would be willing to set up a sked (20 or 40
> meters),
> > I
> > can be available at pretty much any time of the day (family
> permitting!)
> > 
> > 
> > Alaska
> > Louisiana
> > New Mexico
> > Oklahoma
> > South Carolina
> > West Virginia
> > Wyoming (We didn't even hear you guys on Field Day!) 
> > 
> > And, while I'm at it... the following states I have worked but
> can't
> > seem to
> > get QSL cards back from (despite the fact that I've sent SASE's
> TWICE!
> > Whatever happened to QSL'ing?  But I digress!)
> > 
> > Alabama
> > Iowa
> > Kentucky
> > Nevada
> > North Carolina
> > Oregon
> > Utah
> > 
> > Contact me off list if you're willing to set up a sked.  I had
> hoped to
> > work
> > the 070 Firecracker Sprint this weekend to try to fill in the gaps,
> but
> > the
> > XYL has other plans for me!
> > 
> > 73 de WM4B
> > Mike
> > Kathleen, GA
> > mwbesemer at cox.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SOC mailing list
> SOC at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
> 
> Mailman: User Guide for List Subscribers
> http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>