[SOC] Re: [E-Q&A] Nothing much
Ian C. Purdie
[email protected]
Wed, 04 Feb 2004 22:12:54 +1100
Paul Bartlett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just remebered this anecdote. I don't think I've posted this before but if
> I have then it just confirms my truly SOC status. It's a tale of SOC
> proportion...
To our folks on EQ&A that means nothing. All of my following comments are for my
folks at EQ&A who are suitably confused.
I'll explain, SOC means "second" class operator. Second Class at everything,
even walking down the street and falling down.
This includes Paul [what you been drinkin' mate, and myself. Others may remain
anonymous]
Actually we have some of the highest class second class operators around. Many
contribute freely of their time to to EQ&A. Among them are [censored].
They'd scientifically shoot this story down.
> Some years back, they were developing the 'high speed train' here in the UK.
>
> There was some concern as to the ability of the windscreen (windshield) to
> withstand birdstrike. An American organisation was contacted (I think it
> might have been NASA) and advice sought.
You know the rest of the story.
Ian
BTW - SOC is a "real" list, with "real" people, with "real" brains...