[SOC] spam to arrl.net

Bill Cunningham [email protected]
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:50:51 -0500


Thanks.  If enough do that, they may get the msg.
And if they block that address, we can create another -just like the
spammers.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Hank Kohl K8DD" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 5:31 PM
Subject: Re: [SOC] spam to arrl.net


> I just went through the Spamnix directory and forwarded to
> [email protected] all the emails that have the multiple @arrl.net
address's.
>
> Guess one of two things will happen .... The webmaster will respond or
they
> will kill my forwarding!
>
> 73    hank    k8dd
> soc #69
>
>
>
> At 3/24/2003 04:43 PM -0500, Bill Cunningham wrote:
>
> >Dunno about other users of arrl.net forwarding service, but I am
inundated
> >with spam that that comes exclusively to that address.  I've been
> >accumulating a list of  message handling rules to delete  the ones whose
> >form is recognizable (e.g. text contains "horny") and a really large list
of
> >blocked senders. Still, I get 4-6 pieces of crap per day this way.
> >
> >The ARRL website says in effect "not my problem" and the SM has blown it
> >off.  Today, I phoned to renew QST subscription and suggested that the
> >forwarding service was ceasing to be a service.  The lady to whom I spoke
> >suggested autoforwarding this stuff to [email protected]  as the most
> >likely way to get attention.  I've just converted all my rules to do just
> >this and will forward all future spam.  If you get spam to
> >[email protected], recommend you do the same.  And you wonder why Yahoo
> >blocked them?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >SOC mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
>
> _______________________________________________
> SOC mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
>