[SOC] SOC et Tume

Tue, 1 Jul 2003 18:14:56 +0100

No not that one; the first one where I failed to spot that we are 5 hours
apart rather than 6....

Paul :-)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Cunningham" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 10:08 PM
Subject: Re: [SOC] SOC et Tume

> Quite possibly, but then again I didn't sleep through it.  Or maybe I
slept
> through it and didn't know it.
>
> Still doing damage assessment on QSLs that have gone out.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Bartlett" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 12:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [SOC] SOC et Tume
>
>
> > Is this the reason for our failed sked...?
> >
> > Paul ;-)
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bill Cunningham" <[email protected]>
> > To: "SOC1" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 9:14 PM
> > Subject: [SOC] SOC et Tume
> >
> >
> > > Today is 1 July, 3 months after change to EDT.  Sometime after moving
> > shack
> > > indoors from garage, I set computer clock to UTC to celebrate the joy
of
> > > computer logging.  But, I but didn't unselect the "change with
daylight
> > > saving time" feature.  You guessed it.  There's a bunch of dorked up
log
> > > entries.
> > >
> > > I luv it when a plan comes apart.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SOC mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SOC mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
>
> _______________________________________________
> SOC mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
>