[SOC] Club call

[Bill Cunningham]

Thinking outside US is good.  lt opens up things like F0OLS

And if our Brit friends really had balls, they would go for G0NAD


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob N0UF" <n0uf@kc.rr.com>
To: <soc@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: [SOC] Club call


> If we have enough members to qualify, I don't see why SOC
> couldn't get a club call from England, France, Australia and
> wherever if those countries members wanted to do it.
>
> 73
> Bob
> SOC #521
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <f5pbl@qsl.net>
> To: "SOC" <soc@mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:17 AM
> Subject: [SOC] Vanity call
>
>
> >
> > Re,
> >
> > <<
> > A new club call can't be applied for on-line, it takes two signatures,
the
> > trustee and an officer of the club who is not the trustee and is an FCC
> > licensed ham, sorry Claude.
> > >>
> >
> > Do not worry, I am fully aware of that and that's why I have written
than
> as an
> > oversea member (meaning not holding a FCC licence), I can hardly help
you
> > but "dans l'esprit".
> > Besides that ... a F/KC#SOC activation can be funny too.
> > BTW, "KC" with the French pronounciation ("cass�") means "broken".
> >
> > Of course, a more SOC way to do it is for me to get a FCC licence (I
guess
> it
> > should be possible to find 2 VEC at the US embassy in Paris) and then I
> will be
> > able to use the club call in a more efficient way.
> >
> > <<
> > If N7YA, Adam, the Reflector administrator lets us know how many hams
that
> > is we'll know the number of votes needed for a majority.
> > >>
> >
> > FYI, Adam has not been seen on this list for too much time now and not
> only me
> > but some other friends are worrying abt that, really.
> > So, for some months now I have been "auto-nominated" as Reflector Admin.
> > As for the info you are asking for, there is several ways to get it :
> > 1) look at the monthly stats, the very first line or maybe the 2nd one
is
> > stating how much people are subscribers
> > 2) if you do not have this email anymore, you can still look at the
online
> > archives ( http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/soc/ )
> > 3) you can even go to http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc to
> access to
> > your account and get the info.
> > 4) last but not least, you can read it here right now : 63 , 55 of us
are
> > receiving the "non-digest" version, the remaining 8 preferring keeping
the
> good
> > stuff for their week-end evenings.
> >
> > The majority is approx. around 32 but I think first that we should vote
to
> > decide which majority we should use : absolute one, voting/simple one or
> > the "2/3" one ?... (and which majority should be used for this 1st vote
> ??)
> >
> > The remark sent by Dennis ("getting a club call is _NOT_ in the SOC
> spirit") is
> > not a stupid one in itself (!!) but once agn it will put me out of the
> game for
> > F clubs call, with some exceptions, have a K as their first letter in
the
> > suffix.
> > But as usual .. who cares ?
> >
> > A suivre !
> >
> > 72!
> > Claude, F5PBL
> > _______________________________________________
> > SOC mailing list
> > SOC@mailman.qth.net
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
>
> _______________________________________________
> SOC mailing list
> SOC@mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc