[SOC] Brainstorming on J1 ...
[email protected]
[email protected]
Fri, 31 May 2002 19:40:20 +0200 (MEST)
> Would not j1 be more appropriate?
I've got it !!! And I am sure that even Bill did not intend this one ...
But as would has said Mr Holmes, "Elementary Dear Watson" :
J = H--
How SOC I was to ask for the meaning of J1 ...
Guys, I guess you are out with all your imaginary axes.
With all your negative square you remembered me my good old math hours at the
university ;o))
In the meantime I have rx a "private" email abt SOC#00 issuance and I am glad
to see that at least someone has react "the good way" ... And I do have now the
WRITTEN evidence that someone in the group is not SOC at all, a spy of the 1st
Class indeed. But I will keep his name secret ... for now !
Dear Unknown Friend, just to tell you that I do agree with you and from the
beginning in fact I was embarassed by this #00 exactly for the same reason you
have given ... BTW, sri for K5AAR but I am not guilty for this one for I was
not here by that time ;o))
73!
Claude
PS: hummm ... how good I feel to put some "mystery" on this thread .... :o))
http://www.qsl.net/f5pbl
http://www.qsl.net/soc
DIG #4451 - FISTS #7722 - SOC #503 - 10-X #71724