[SOC] KC0OCR - Vanity Call Selection

Todd Butler [email protected]
Thu, 12 Dec 2002 09:35:10 -0600


Paul wrote:

> See below
>
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 05:18:10 -0600 [email protected] wrote:
>  These are the Vanity Call suggestions received from all interested parties.
> > They are listed in alpha numeric order.
>
> > Please number them in your order of preference 1 to 17.  This will
> determine the > order they are placed on the vanity application.  The first
> available choice when > our application is processed is the call we get.
>
> > Please respond to the reflector.
>
> > If you change your mind just resend the e-mail, I'll only count the last
> one.
>
> > Happy Holidays.
>
> > 73
> > Bob N�UF
> > Trustee SOC Call KC�OCR
>
> > K�AGN  _1__
> > K�BOO  _9__
> > K�DUH  _8__
> > K�HUH  _10__
> > K�III  _18 ___
> > K�SOC __11_
> > K1SOC  _2__
> > K2SOC  _3__
> > K4SOC  _4__
> > K5SOC  _5__
> > K6SOC  _6__
> > K7SOC   7___
> > W�0OW _12__
> > W�SOC _13__
> > W1SOC _14__
> > W5SOC _15__
> > W8SOC _16__
> > W9SOC _17__

I was more set on W�MAN, but some girl in Virginia already took that one.

Is  G1RL  available?     (looking for virgins, not Virginia)

73,     Todd        N�NCL     SOC # 533


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed.
Please post in Plain-Text only.---