[SOC] KC0OCR - Vanity Call Selection
Todd Butler
[email protected]
Thu, 12 Dec 2002 09:35:10 -0600
Paul wrote:
> See below
>
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 05:18:10 -0600 [email protected] wrote:
> These are the Vanity Call suggestions received from all interested parties.
> > They are listed in alpha numeric order.
>
> > Please number them in your order of preference 1 to 17. This will
> determine the > order they are placed on the vanity application. The first
> available choice when > our application is processed is the call we get.
>
> > Please respond to the reflector.
>
> > If you change your mind just resend the e-mail, I'll only count the last
> one.
>
> > Happy Holidays.
>
> > 73
> > Bob N�UF
> > Trustee SOC Call KC�OCR
>
> > K�AGN _1__
> > K�BOO _9__
> > K�DUH _8__
> > K�HUH _10__
> > K�III _18 ___
> > K�SOC __11_
> > K1SOC _2__
> > K2SOC _3__
> > K4SOC _4__
> > K5SOC _5__
> > K6SOC _6__
> > K7SOC 7___
> > W�0OW _12__
> > W�SOC _13__
> > W1SOC _14__
> > W5SOC _15__
> > W8SOC _16__
> > W9SOC _17__
I was more set on W�MAN, but some girl in Virginia already took that one.
Is G1RL available? (looking for virgins, not Virginia)
73, Todd N�NCL SOC # 533
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed.
Please post in Plain-Text only.---