[SOC] Re: Mailman Stats for List: SOC

Tue, 16 Apr 2002 13:04:29 -0500

No.  The third poster.  He can't even make Second Place.  How Third Class!

Dan W. Dooley  WB5TKA  Bedford, Texas
   e-mail to: [email protected]
   Web site: http://www.qsl.net/wb9tka
May Goddes love blest ye alle
"Ancient Pistol, I do partly understand your meaning."

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Crooke" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: [SOC] Re: Mailman Stats for List: SOC

> At 01:56 PM 4/16/2002 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
> >  Just thought you guys would like to know who the SOC "big ten"
> > are...this is
> >from the server.  Maybe Rob should get a plaque, far and away our top
poster.
> >
> >
> >  Top 10 posters to the list:
> >       36    [email protected],
> >       16    [email protected],
> >       14    [email protected],
> >       10    [email protected],
> >        9    [email protected],
> >        9    [email protected],
> >        7    [email protected],
> >        5    [email protected],
> >        4    [email protected],
> >        4    [email protected],
> >    >>
>
>
> Well,  I don't think we should award the top poster anything on the SOC
> site.  It seems much more fitting that the second poster should get the
> award ;-)
>