[Snowball] The snowballs thus far..
Bill Cromwell
wrcromwell at gmail.com
Mon Jul 23 08:48:57 EDT 2012
On Sun, 2012-07-22 at 23:42 -0500, Jeramy Ross wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We have both snowballs rolling around, and it all seems to be going pretty
> well!
>
> We have 15 active participants so far, and some rumblings of more joining
> in later on.
>
> This is great!! However, some potential issues maybe popping up. With the
> multiple groups, and snowballs... it becomes possible that we have a
> collision between the balls with one ball moving slower than the other.
> This becomes more of a possibility with more groups and more balls...
>
> So... we have some options.. leave things, and plans, as they are and just
> deal with it when it happens. Or modify things by limiting it to two
> groups and allowing them to grow as they will. The larger group size
> somewhat limits the chances of the smowball wrecks... OR change things to
> go back to just one big group with just one ball rolling through. With the
> last option, you can expect the ball to roll through at least once or twice
> a year (with an assumed group size not much larger than what it would be
> today and an assumed speed of around the same of what we're seeing today).
>
> Opinions?? Ideas?? Complaints??
>
> :)
>
> Have a good week everyone!
>
> 73,
> Jeramy W5XTL
Hi Jeramy,
Murphy is an equal opportunity harasser so both snowballs will probably
have about the sames kinds of delays. I would think leaving it the way
it is is the best bet.
The one thing I did think about was mixing up the names so the people in
each group change around a little each time the snowballs restart. That
would have different people on each snowball list for each cycle. With
smaller groups that might not be as much of a benefit as with two
continuously growing lists.
73,
Bill KU8H
More information about the Snowball
mailing list