[SkyHub] Question for the groupe

[Paul Schumann]

   So many of you know so much more than i do, but here's my concern.
Amature radio licenses are used for two way communication. We can not
broadcast (pre-recorded music, etc) one way, hence the check in at the
beginning and breaks for questions or comments. I'm thinking AI would fall
into the broadcast rather than the two way communication category and be
disallowed by the FCC.

Paul KF0EYS

On Tue, Jun 16, 2026, 4:27 AM Bryan Gunsher via SkyHub <
skyhub at mailman.qth.net> wrote:

> I personally would not like to have to listen to a net hosted by AI.
> Nets are about operators doing the net.
> I am against AI in amateur radio. It’s about us talking on the radio.
> If you want to hear a perfect weather report get it on TV.
> Just my opinion.
> Bryan
> K6SKI
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jun 15, 2026, at 8:45 PM, Bruce Hofer via SkyHub <
> skyhub at mailman.qth.net> wrote:
>
> For my rebuttal :
>  Ai voice / synthesize voice is used on Public safety frequencies ie :
> “Dispatching “ along with several  “other applications”  that fall under
> the all mighty FCC control ..Ham radio hobby is an ever evolving concept in
> its own self . With experimentation / development/ research  etc. that is
> going on daily in several different directions within this Hobby . ..as
> “change” disagrees with some ,but maybe it should be embraced in order for
> the hobby to advance…
> Bruce..
> Sent from …
>
> On Jun 15, 2026, at 20:00, Randall ~ AE7RJ <ae7rj at jonesnw.net> wrote:
>
>  Bruce,
>
> In my ever so humble opinion ... The Commission wouldn't be all that
> happy with an AI on the air on amateur frequencies.
>
> Repeaters identify using a synthesized voice, but that's canned with a
> limited vocabulary. It won't say something it should not.  An AI is going
> to say whatever is on the script.
>
> --
> 73s ...
>
> *Randall Jones*
> ae7rj at jonesnw.net
> *AE7RJ* / *WSDI868*
>
> 1N73LL1G3NC3 15 7H3 4B1L17Y 70 4D4P7 70 CH4NG3
> — 573PH3N H4WK1NG
> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>
> On 15-Jun-26 13:37, Bruce Hofer via SkyHub wrote:
>
> Just wondering …for the weather Net …( please don’t take this wrong and
> it’s not intended to offend anyone ) …my question would be if the regional
> forecast couldn’t be read via AI generated speech ???? ..
>
> Please …someone check on that as an option …and like I stated not to
> offend or degrade anyone with my question for the group… 73’ all
>
> Bruce
>
> De:Kc0efs
> Sent from …
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> SkyHub mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/skyhub
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:SkyHub at mailman.qth.net <SkyHub at mailman.qth.net>
>
> Unsubscribe / Edit options:http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/skyhub
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> SkyHub mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/skyhub
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:SkyHub at mailman.qth.net
>
> Unsubscribe / Edit options:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/skyhub
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> SkyHub mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/skyhub
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:SkyHub at mailman.qth.net
>
> Unsubscribe / Edit options:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/skyhub
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/skyhub/attachments/20260616/c47f7ae6/attachment-0001.html>